ReviewThe American psychologist
Teamwork in the intensive care unit.
Review in The American psychologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Experiences of team collaboration among intensive care nurses during COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of non-technical skills training in intensive care units: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Balanced crystalloid solutions versus normal saline in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Using electronic health record audit logs to identify pediatric intensive care unit teams.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Learning to reflect together: a video-facilitated reflective inquiry and linguistic analysis of collaborative clinical reasoning in intensive care.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- PAUSE-Agents: A Clinician-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent AI Pipeline for ICU-to-Ward Handoff Briefs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Nurses' communication network position and perceptions of teamwork during evidence-based practice implementation.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Patient Safety Implications of Opportunistic Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections in COVID-19 Patients: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Teamwork as a Clinical Competency in Pediatric Cardiology: A Measurement-Feedback-Simulation Framework for Improving Decision-Making and Outcomes.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- A Living Ethics Project to Address Inappropriate Levels of Care: Process and Outcomes.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Quality Assessment of the Iran Intensive Care Unit Registry: A Validation Evaluation Using International Medical Registry Frameworks (2017-2024).Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Interventions to improve mental health in caregivers of adult intensive care patients: a systematic review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Time-limited trials for acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older patients: rationale, communication strategies, and future research.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026Review
- ICU Implementation Determinants and Delivery of Lung Protective Ventilation: A Multihospital Survey and Cohort Study.CHEST critical care · 2026Article
- Contextualising ventilation decisions: an ethnographic study of factors shaping interprofessional decision-making.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Construction of a specialized nurse training Indicator system for cardiac intensive care unit using the Delphi method.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intensive care units (ICUs) provide care to the most severely ill hospitalized patients. Although ICUs increasingly rely on interprofessional teams to provide critical care, little about actual teamwork in this context is well understood. The ICU team is typically comprised of physicians or intensivists, clinical pharmacists, respiratory therapists, dieticians, bedside nurses, clinical psychologists, and clinicians-in-training. ICU teams are distinguished from other health care teams in that they are low in temporal stability, which can impede important team dynamics. Furthermore, ICU teams must work in physically and emotionally challenging environments. Our review of the literature reveals the importance of information sharing and decision-making processes, and identifies potential barriers to successful team performance, including the lack of effective conflict management and the presence of multiple and sometimes conflicting goals. Key knowledge gaps about ICU teams include the need for more actionable data linking ICU team structure to team functioning and patient-, family-, ICU-, and hospital-level outcomes. In particular, research is needed to better delineate and define the ICU team, identify additional psychosocial phenomena that impact ICU team performance, and address varying and often competing indicators of ICU team effectiveness as a multivariate and multilevel problem that requires better understanding of the independent effects and interdependencies between nested elements (i.e., hospitals, ICUs, and ICU teams). Ultimately, efforts to advance team-based care are essential for improving ICU performance, but more work is needed to develop actionable interventions that ensure that critically ill patients receive the best care possible. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.