Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29792444›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2019

Automaticity in the recognition of nonverbal emotional vocalizations.

César F Lima, Andrey Anikin, Ana Catarina Monteiro, Sophie K Scott, São Luís Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emotion in Nonverbal Communication: Comparing Animal and Human Vocalizations and Human Text Messages.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2025
    Article
  7. Enhanced salience of musical sounds in singers and instrumentalists.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Pupil-Linked Arousal Response Reveals Aberrant Attention Regulation among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. Emotional authenticity modulates affective and social trait inferences from voices.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

César F LimaFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto.ORCID 0000-0003-3058-7204
Andrey AnikinDivision of Cognitive Science, Department of Philosophy, Lund University.ORCID 0000-0002-1250-8261
Ana Catarina MonteiroFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto.
Sophie K ScottInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London.
São Luís CastroFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-3596

Funding

Bial FoundationFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaPortuguese Foundation for Science and TechnologyPrograma Operacional Fatores de Competitividade and Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to perceive the emotions of others is crucial for everyday social interactions. Important aspects of visual socioemotional processing, such as the recognition of facial expressions, are known to depend on largely automatic mechanisms. However, whether and how properties of automaticity extend to the auditory domain remains poorly understood. Here we ask if nonverbal auditory emotion recognition is a controlled deliberate or an automatic efficient process, using vocalizations such as laughter, crying, and screams. In a between-subjects design (N = 112), and covering eight emotions (four positive), we determined whether emotion recognition accuracy (a) is improved when participants actively deliberate about their responses (compared with when they respond as fast as possible) and (b) is impaired when they respond under low and high levels of cognitive load (concurrent task involving memorizing sequences of six or eight digits, respectively). Response latencies were also measured. Mixed-effects models revealed that recognition accuracy was high across emotions, and only minimally affected by deliberation and cognitive load; the benefits of deliberation and costs of cognitive load were significant mostly for positive emotions, notably amusement/laughter, and smaller or absent for negative ones; response latencies did not suffer under low or high cognitive load; and high recognition accuracy (approximately 90%) could be reached within 500 ms after the stimulus onset, with performance exceeding chance-level already between 300 and 360 ms. These findings indicate that key features of automaticity, namely fast and efficient/effortless processing, might be a modality-independent component of emotion recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

ComprehensionCryingEmotionsLaughterNonverbal CommunicationRecognition, PsychologyFemaleHumansMaleProbabilityReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29792444
PMCPMC6383750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.