Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29792230›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Community health worker support to improve HIV treatment outcomes for older children and adolescents in Zimbabwe: a process evaluation of the ZENITH trial.

Chido Dziva Chikwari, Victoria Simms, Joanna Busza, Ethel Dauya, Tsitsi Bandason, Prosper Chonzi, Shungu Munyati, Hilda Mujuru, Rashida A Ferrand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chido Dziva ChikwariLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Chido.DzivaChikwari@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-3603
Victoria SimmsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Joanna BuszaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Ethel DauyaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi BandasonBiomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Prosper ChonziCity of Harare Health Services Department, Rowan Martin Building, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Shungu MunyatiBiomedical Research and Training Institute, 10 Seagrave Road, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Hilda MujuruUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, P O Box A178, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rashida A FerrandLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBBiomedical Research and Training Institute · ZWUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZW

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 095875/Z/11Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health worker (CHW)-delivered support visits to children living with HIV and their caregivers significantly reduced odds of virological failure among the children in the ZENITH trial conducted in Zimbabwe. We conducted a process evaluation to assess fidelity, acceptability, and feasibility of this intervention to identify lessons that could inform replication and scale-up of this approach.

methodsField manuals kept by each CHW, records from monthly supervisory meetings, and participant data collected throughout the trial were used to assess the intervention's implementation. Data extracted from field manuals included visit type, content, and duration. Minutes from monthly supervisory meetings were used to capture CHW attendance.

resultsThe trial enrolled 172 participants in the intervention arm of whom 5 subsequently refused all visits, 1 died before the intervention could be delivered, and 1 could not be located. Manuals for 8 participants were not returned, 3 were incorrectly entered, and 1 manual was lost. We had 154 manuals available for analysis. A total of 1553 visits were successfully conducted (median 11 per participant, range 1-20). Additionally, CHWs made 85 visits where they were unable to make contact with the family. Thirteen (8.4%) participants received 5 or fewer visits, 10 moved out of the study area, and 3 died. CHWs discussed disclosure with the child/family for over 89% of participants and assisted clients with developing and reviewing their personal treatment plan with over 85% of participants. Of the 20 CHWs (3 male, 17 female) selected to implement the intervention, 19 were retained at the end of the trial.

conclusionsThe intervention was acceptable to participants with most receiving and accepting the required number of visits. Key strenghts were high staff retention and fidelity to the intervention. This community-based intervention was an acceptable and feasible approach to reduce virological failure among children living with HIV.

trial registrationThe ZENITH trial was registered on 25 October 2012 in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry under the trial registration number PACTR201212000442288 . It can be found at http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201212000442288 .

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeUgandaZimbabweAdherenceARTChildrenCommunity-based supportHIV

Identifiers

PMID29792230
PMCPMC5966852
OpenAlexW2805837539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.