ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2018
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: comparison between Etest and a broth dilution method.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial resistance, genetic diversity and virulence associated factors ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Determination of antibiotic resistance using three phenotypic methods in Campylobacter coli strains isolated from commercial chicken meat in Lima, Peru.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2025Article
- Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Campylobacter sp. isolated from human stool samples including comparison of ellipsoid test and broth microdilution for meropenem.GMS infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Characterization and application of a novelCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- Insights into the Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of a Next Generation ProbioticInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Clinical and microbiological characterization of Aerococcus urinae bacteraemias at Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022Article
- The Efficacy of Green Synthesized Nanosilver in Reducing the Incidence of Post-Harvest Apple Fruit Brown Rot.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Diarrheal Morbidity During Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Diagnostic Yield of Stool Cultures.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2021Article
- AMR-Diag: Neural network based genotype-to-phenotype prediction of resistance towards β-lactams inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Hyper-AerotolerantFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Systematic Evaluation of Whole-Genome Sequencing Based Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- WGS-Based Prediction and Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Hyper-AerotolerantMicroorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCampylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne gasteroenteritis worldwide. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Campylobacter spp. is not routinely performed by most clinical laboratories. However, the emergence of resistant isolates strengthens the importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the critical need for epidemiologic surveillance. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Etest and Sensititre kit (a broth microdilution method) as methods for susceptibility tests and the critical need for epidemiologic surveillance. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Etest and Sensititre kit (a broth microdilution method) as methods for susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. to tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin.
methodsSixty-six Campylobacter isolates were collected from feces samples and subjected to susceptibility testing by Etest and Sensititre, a broth microdilution kit for tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) results of each method were determined and compared.
resultsSimilar MIC interpretations for tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin were found in 97%, 98.5%, and 100% of the isolates, respectively, indicating a good level of agreement between Etest and Sensititre (p < 0.0001); additionally, the correlation between the two methods was highly significant for the three tested antibiotics (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsBoth the broth microdilution and the Etest are reliable and convenient methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. The Sensititre kit has the advantages of high availability and the automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.