Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29792182›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

BoostMe accurately predicts DNA methylation values in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of multiple human tissues.

Luli S Zou, Michael R Erdos, D Leland Taylor, Peter S Chines, Arushi Varshney, McDonnell Genome Institute, Stephen C J Parker, Francis S Collins, John P Didion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. slideimp: efficient imputation of DNA methylation data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Computational Methods for Single-cell DNA Methylome Analysis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  16. CpG Transformer for imputation of single-cell methylomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luli S ZouNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Michael R ErdosNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
D Leland TaylorNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Peter S ChinesNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Arushi VarshneyDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
McDonnell Genome Institute
Stephen C J ParkerDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Francis S CollinsNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. collinsf@od.nih.gov.
John P DidionNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.

Funding

Genetic analysis of type II diabetes in Finnish populationZIAHG000024 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ERDOS, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2025
$38.2M
Synthesizing genome, epigenome, and transcriptome datasets in type 2 diabetes.R00DK099240 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PARKER, STEPHEN CJ · 2015 to 2017
$726k
American Diabetes Association 1-14-INI-07National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R00DK099240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisulfite sequencing is widely employed to study the role of DNA methylation in disease; however, the data suffer from biases due to coverage depth variability. Imputation of methylation values at low-coverage sites may mitigate these biases while also identifying important genomic features associated with predictive power.

resultsHere we describe BoostMe, a method for imputing low-quality DNA methylation estimates within whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) data. BoostMe uses a gradient boosting algorithm, XGBoost, and leverages information from multiple samples for prediction. We find that BoostMe outperforms existing algorithms in speed and accuracy when applied to WGBS of human tissues. Furthermore, we show that imputation improves concordance between WGBS and the MethylationEPIC array at low WGBS depth, suggesting improved WGBS accuracy after imputation.

conclusionsOur findings support the use of BoostMe as a preprocessing step for WGBS analysis.

Indexed as

Whole Genome SequencingAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDNA MethylationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfitesAdiposeDNA methylationEPICImputationPancreatic isletsSkeletal muscleWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS)XGBoost

Identifiers

PMID29792182
PMCPMC5966887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.