ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2018
Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake of calcium silicate-based cements.
Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apatite-like calcium phosphate deposition and physicochemical properties of an aspartic acid-functionalized hydraulic cement.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Short-term radiographic changes of extruded NeoSealer Flo in a simulated enlarged-apex model: influence of moisture and periapical support.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Effect of n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Coating on the Microhardness of MM-MTA After Exposure to Moisture and Human Blood.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Micro-CT analysis of calcium silicate-based cements in simulated acidic and neutral environments: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Fabrication and characterization of a bioactive glass and tricalcium silicate incorporated resin-based root canal sealer.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Chemical Stability and Bond Strength of Endodontic Sealers Exposed to Acidic, Alkaline and Protein-Rich Environments: An In Vitro Investigation.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Evaluation of compressive strength, microhardness and solubility of zinc-oxide eugenol cement reinforced with E-glass fibers.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Physicochemical properties of AH plus bioceramic sealer, Bio-C Sealer, and ADseal root canal sealer.Head & face medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing Mechanical and Biological Properties of Zinc Phosphate Dental Cement with Akermanite and Hardystonite Nanoparticles: A Synthesis and Characterization Study.International journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- In vivo method to evaluate volumetric changes in bioceramic repair materials.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Thermal, chemical and physical analysis of VDW.1Seal, Fill Root ST, and ADseal root canal sealers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility, bioactive potential, porosity, and interface analysis calcium silicate repair cements in a dentin tube model.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Push out bond strength of hydraulic cements used at different thicknesses.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Premixed Calcium Silicate and Resin Sealers.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.International endodontic journal · 2022Review
- Impact of Immersion Media on Physical Properties and Bioactivity of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers.Polymers · 2022Article
- Article
- Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the flow and filling ability of endodontic materials using different test models.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2020Article
- Micro-computed tomography high resolution evaluation of dimensional and morphological changes of 3 root-end filling materials in simulated physiological conditions.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis between resin-based root canal sealer and recent bioceramic-based root canal sealers using MicroCT, film thickness, and solubility.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the absorption/fluid uptake, solubility and porosity of White mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus, Biodentine (BIO), and zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE). MATERIAL AND
methodsSolubility was evaluated after immersion in distilled water for 7 and 30 days. Porosity was evaluated using digital inverted microscope, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). For the fluid uptake test, specimens were immersed in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) for 1, 7, 14 and 28 days. Fluid absorption, solubility and porosity of the materials were measured after each period. Statistical evaluation was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests, with a significance level at 5%.
resultsAfter 7 and 30 days, BIO showed the highest solubility (p<0.05). All methods demonstrated that MTA had total porosity higher than BIO and ZOE (p<0.05). Micro-CT analysis showed that MTA had the highest porosity at the initial period, after its setting time (p<0.05). After 7 and 30 days, ZOE had porosity lower than MTA and BIO (p<0.05). Absorption was similar among the materials (p>0.05), and higher fluid uptake and solubility were observed for MTA in the fluid uptake test (p<0.05).
conclusionsBIO had the highest solubility in the conventional test and MTA had higher porosity and fluid uptake. ZOE had lower values of solubility, porosity and fluid uptake. Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake are related, and the tests used provided complementary data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.