ArticlePloS one2018
Complex interactions in a novel SCN5A compound mutation associated with long QT and Brugada syndrome: Implications for Na+ channel blocking pharmacotherapy for de novo conduction disease.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SCN5A mutation, P1332L, is linked to a malignant form of congenital long QT syndrome, type 3 (LQT3), and affected patients are highly responsive to the Na+ channel blocking drug, mexiletine. In contrast, A647D is an atypical SCN5A mutation causing Brugada syndrome. An asymptomatic male with both P1332L and A647D presented with varying P wave/QRS aberrancy and mild QTc prolongation which did not shorten measurably with mexiletine.
objectiveWe characterized the biophysical properties of P1332L, A647D and wild-type (WT) Na+ channels as well as their combinations in order to understand our proband's phenotype and to guide mexilitine therapy.
methodsNa+ channel biophysics and mexilitine-binding kinetics were assessed using heterologous expression studies in CHO-K1 cells and human ventricular myocyte modeling.
resultsCompared to WT, P1332L channels displayed a hyperpolarizing shift in inactivation, slower inactivation and prominent late Na+ currents (INa). While A647D had no effect on the biophysical properties of INa, it reduced peak and late INa density when co-expressed with either WT or P1332L. Additionally, while P1332L channels had greater sensitivity to block by mexiletine compared to WT, this was reduced in the presence of A647D. Modelling studies revealed that mixing P1332L with A647D channels, action potential durations were shortened compared to P1332L, while peak INa was reduced compared to either A647D coexpressing with WT or WT alone.
conclusionsWhile A647D mitigates the lethal LQT3 phenotype seen with P1332L, it also reduces mexilitine sensitivity and decreases INa density. These results explain our proband's mild repolarization abnormality and prominent conduction defect in the atria and ventricles, but also suggest that expression of P1332L with A647D yields a novel disease phenotype for which mexiletine pharmacotherapy is no longer suitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.