Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29791476›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Identifying county characteristics associated with resident well-being: A population based study.

Brita Roy, Carley Riley, Jeph Herrin, Erica S Spatz, Anita Arora, Kenneth P Kell, John Welsh, Elizabeth Y Rula, Harlan M Krumholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brita RoyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Carley RileyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Jeph HerrinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3671-3622
Erica S SpatzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Anita AroraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-5230
Kenneth P KellTivity Health, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-0795
John WelshYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Elizabeth Y RulaTivity Health, Franklin, Tennessee, United States of America.
Harlan M KrumholzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K12 HS023000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWell-being is a positively-framed, holistic assessment of health and quality of life that is associated with longevity and better health outcomes. We aimed to identify county attributes that are independently associated with a comprehensive, multi-dimensional assessment of individual well-being.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study examining associations between 77 pre-specified county attributes and a multi-dimensional assessment of individual US residents' well-being, captured by the Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index. Our cohort included 338,846 survey participants, randomly sampled from 3,118 US counties or county equivalents.

findingsWe identified twelve county-level factors that were independently associated with individual well-being scores. Together, these twelve factors explained 91% of the variance in individual well-being scores, and they represent four conceptually distinct categories: demographic (% black); social and economic (child poverty, education level [<high school, high school diploma/equivalent, college degree], household income, % divorced); clinical care (% eligible women obtaining mammography, preventable hospital stays per 100,000, number of federally qualified health centers); and physical environment (% commuting by bicycle and by public transit).

conclusionsTwelve factors across social and economic, clinical care, and physical environmental county-level factors explained the majority of variation in resident well-being.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentFemaleHumansMaleMammographyMiddle AgedPovertyQuality of LifeResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsTransportationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29791476
PMCPMC5965855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.