ArticlePloS one2018
Scan patterns during scene viewing predict individual differences in clinical traits in a normative sample.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emotional scene processing in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Conceptual priorities shape individual gaze patterns during naturalistic visual attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A review of machine learning in scanpath analysis for passive gaze-based interaction.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Test-retest reliability of eye tracking measures in a computerized Trail Making Test.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Do cognitive load and ADHD traits affect the tendency to prioritise social information in scenes?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022Article
- Quantifying the Predictability of Visual Scanpaths Using Active Information Storage.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Center bias outperforms image salience but not semantics in accounting for attention during scene viewing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Social Visual Perception Under the Eye of Bayesian Theories in Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Advanced Modeling of Spatial and Temporal Parameters.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Alexithymia and the Evaluation of Emotionally Valenced Scenes.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) Applied to Visual Narratives.Topics in cognitive science · 2020Article
- Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Eye Movements in Real-World Scene Photographs: General Characteristics and Effects of Viewing Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between viewer individual differences and gaze control has been largely neglected in the scene perception literature. Recently we have shown a robust association between individual differences in viewer cognitive capacity and scan patterns during scene viewing. These findings suggest other viewer individual differences may also be associated with scene gaze control. Here we expand our findings to quantify the relationship between individual differences in clinical traits and scene viewing behavior in a normative sample. The present study used Successor Representation Scanpath Analysis (SRSA) to quantify the strength of the association between individual differences in scan patterns during real-world scene viewing and individual differences in viewer attention-deficit disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and dyslexia scores. The SRSA results revealed individual differences in vertical scan patterns that explained more than half of the variance in attention-deficit scores, a third of the variance in autism quotient scores, and about a quarter of the variance in dyslexia scores. These results suggest that individual differences in attention-deficit disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and dyslexia scores are most strongly associated with vertical scanning behaviors when viewing real-world scenes. More importantly, our results suggest scene scan patterns have promise as potential diagnostic tools and provide insight into the types of vertical scan patterns that are most diagnostic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.