Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29791206›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Effect of CT window settings on size measurements of the solid component in subsolid nodules: evaluation of prediction efficacy of the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma.

Qiong Li, Ya-Feng Gu, Li Fan, Qing-Chu Li, Yi Xiao, Shi-Yuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MRI for Lung Cancer Management: Any Closer to Clinical Application?Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiong Li1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Ya-Feng Gu1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Li Fan1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Qing-Chu Li1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Yi Xiao
Shi-Yuan Liu1 Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University , Shanghai , China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the predictive value of size measurements of the solid components in pulmonary subsolid nodules with different CT window settings and to evaluate the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma.  Methods: The preoperative chest CT images and pathological data of 125 patients were retrospectively evaluated. The analysis included 127 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas that manifested as subsolid nodules. All subsolid nodules were divided into two groups: 69 in group A, including 22 adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS) and 47 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA); 58 in group B that included invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPA). The size of the solid component in the pulmonary subsolid nodules were calculated in one dimensional, two dimensional and three dimensional views using lung and mediastinal windows that were recorded as 1D-SCLW, 2D-SCLW, 3D-SCLW, 1D-SCMW, 2D-SCMW and 3D-SCMW, respectively. Furthermore, the volume of solid component with a threshold of -300HU was measured using lung window (3D-SCT). All the quantitative features were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the significant predictor of the degree of pathological malignancy.  Results: The 1D-SCLW, 2D-SCLW, 3D-SCLW, 1D-SCMW, 2D-SCMW, 3D-SCMW and 3D-SCT views of group B were significantly larger than those of group A (p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that 3D-SCT (OR = 1.018, 95%CI: 1.005 ~ 1.03, p <0.05=was the independent predictive factor. The larger SCT was significantly associated with IPAs.  Conclusion: 3D-SCT of subsolid nodules during preoperative CT can be used to predict the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma, which may provide a more objective and convenient selection criterion for clinical application.  Advances in knowledge:  Applying threshold of -300 HU with lung window setting would be better than other window setting for the evaluation of solid component in subsolid nodules. Computer-aided volumetry of the solid component in subsolid nodules can more accurately predict the degree of pathological malignancy than the other dimensional measurements.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID29791206
PMCPMC6209492
OpenAlexW2803584316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.