ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Different MR features for differentiation of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma according to tumor size.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Pooled it
- Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: A rare and challenging diagnostic entity - A Case Report.Oncoscience · 2026Article
- Clinical value and applicability of radiomics in differential diagnosis of dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Assessment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with LI-RADS in the high-risk population: MRI diagnosis and postoperative survival.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- How to differentiate between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with rim arterial phase hyperenhancement?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Imaging features and management of focal liver lesions.World journal of radiology · 2024Review
- A multi-center diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI and clinical features.European radiology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of MRI Features in Dual-phenotype Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- A multivariate model based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using Li-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of dual‑phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- A nomogram based on ultrasonographic features and clinical indicators for differentiating mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MRI features with other primary hepatocellular carcinoma and differential diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Holistic management of hepatocellular carcinoma: The hepatologist's comprehensive playbook.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022Review
- Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: An Update on Pathology and Diagnostic Approach.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Utility of mean platelet volume in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Preoperative prediction of cytokeratin-19 expression for hepatocellular carcinoma using T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI combined with diffusion-weighted imaging and clinical indicators.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Role of 3D quantitative tumor analysis for predicting overall survival after conventional chemoembolization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- MR Features Based on LI-RADS Ver. 2018 Correlated with Cytokeratin 19 Expression in Combined Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2021Article
- Preoperative Prediction of Cytokeratin 19 Expression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Deep Learning Radiomics Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2021Article
- Liver Imaging and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018 and Other Imaging Features in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Chinese Adults with vs. without Chronic Hepatitis B Viral Infection.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Article
- Focal intrahepatic strictures: A proposal classification based on diagnosis-treatment experience and systemic review.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify reliable magnetic resonance (MR) features for distinguishing mass-forming type of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on tumor size.
methodsThis retrospective study included 395 patients with pathologically confirmed IMCCs (n = 180) and HCCs (n = 215) who underwent pre-operative contrast-enhanced MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MR features were evaluated and clinical data were also recorded. All the characteristics were compared in small (≤3 cm) and large tumor (>3 cm) groups by univariate analysis and subsequently calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis.
resultsMultivariable analysis revealed that rim arterial phase hyperenhancement [odds ratios (ORs) = 13.16], biliary dilation (OR = 23.42) and CA19-9 (OR = 21.45) were significant predictors of large IMCCs (n = 138), and washout appearance (OR = 0.036), enhancing capsule appearance (OR = 0.039), fat in mass (OR = 0.057), chronic liver disease (OR = 0.088) and alpha fetoprotein (OR = 0.019) were more frequently found in large HCCs (n = 143). For small IMCCs (n = 42) and HCCs (n = 72), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (OR = 9.68), target appearance at DWI (OR = 12.51), alpha fetoprotein (OR = 0.12) and sex (OR = 0.20) were independent predictors in multivariate analysis.
conclusionValuable MR features and clinical factors varied for differential diagnosis of IMCCs and HCCs according to tumor size. Advances in knowledge: MR features for differential diagnosis of large IMCC and HCC (>3 cm) are in keeping with that recommended by LI-RADS. However, for small IMCCs and HCCs (≤3 cm), only rim enhancement on arterial phase and target appearance at DWI are reliable predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.