Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29790997›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2018

A multi-institutional study of independent calculation verification in inhomogeneous media using a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson method.

Shunta Jinno, Hidenobu Tachibana, Shunsuke Moriya, Norifumi Mizuno, Ryo Takahashi, Tatsuya Kamima, Satoru Ishibashi, Masanori Sato

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shunta JinnoRadiological Sciences, Graduate Division of Health Sciences, Komazawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenobu TachibanaParticle Therapy Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Shunsuke MoriyaDoctoral Program in Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Chiba, Japan.
Norifumi MizunoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya KamimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru IshibashiDepartment of Radiology, Sasebo City General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masanori SatoRadiological Sciences, Graduate Division of Health Sciences, Komazawa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Komazawa University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPSasebo City General Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In inhomogeneous media, there is often a large systematic difference in the dose between the conventional Clarkson algorithm (C-Clarkson) for independent calculation verification and the superposition-based algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPSs). These treatment site-dependent differences increase the complexity of the radiotherapy planning secondary check. We developed a simple and effective method of heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm (L-Clarkson) to account for the effects of heterogeneity in the lateral dimension, and performed a multi-institutional study to evaluate the effectiveness of the method. In the method, a 2D image reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) images is divided according to lines extending from the reference point to the edge of the multileaf collimator (MLC) or jaw collimator for each pie sector, and the radiological path length (RPL) of each line is calculated on the 2D image to obtain a tissue maximum ratio and phantom scatter factor, allowing the dose to be calculated. A total of 261 plans (1237 beams) for conventional breast and lung treatments and lung stereotactic body radiotherapy were collected from four institutions. Disagreements in dose between the on-site TPSs and a verification program using the C-Clarkson and L-Clarkson algorithms were compared. Systematic differences with the L-Clarkson method were within 1% for all sites, while the C-Clarkson method resulted in systematic differences of 1-5%. The L-Clarkson method showed smaller variations. This heterogeneity correction integrated with the Clarkson algorithm would provide a simple evaluation within the range of -5% to +5% for a radiotherapy plan secondary check.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBreastDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansLungPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29790997
PMCPMC6054244
OpenAlexW2883838052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.