Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29790918›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2018

Temporal and tissue-specific variability of SMN protein levels in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy.

Ewout J N Groen, Elena Perenthaler, Natalie L Courtney, Crispin Y Jordan, Hannah K Shorrock, Dinja van der Hoorn, Yu-Ting Huang, Lyndsay M Murray, Gabriella Viero, Thomas H Gillingwater

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patient-specific responses toMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Long-TermInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ewout J N GroenCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Elena PerenthalerCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Natalie L CourtneyCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Crispin Y JordanCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Hannah K ShorrockCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Dinja van der HoornCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Yu-Ting HuangCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Lyndsay M MurrayCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Gabriella VieroInstitute of Biophysics, CNR Unit at Trento, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy.
Thomas H GillingwaterCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Medical School: Biomedical Sciences.
Mott MacDonald (United Kingdom) · GBDiscovery Centre · CAUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 106098/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive motor neuron disease caused by deleterious variants in SMN1 that lead to a marked decrease in survival motor neuron (SMN) protein expression. Humans have a second SMN gene (SMN2) that is almost identical to SMN1. However, due to alternative splicing the majority of SMN2 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is translated into a truncated, unstable protein that is quickly degraded. Because the presence of SMN2 provides a unique opportunity for therapy development in SMA patients, the mechanisms that regulate SMN2 splicing and mRNA expression have been elucidated in great detail. In contrast, how much SMN protein is produced at different developmental time points and in different tissues remains under-characterized. In this study, we addressed this issue by determining SMN protein expression levels at three developmental time points across six different mouse tissues and in two distinct mouse models of SMA ('severe' Taiwanese and 'intermediate' Smn2B/- mice). We found that, in healthy control mice, SMN protein expression was significantly influenced by both age and tissue type. When comparing mouse models of SMA, we found that, despite being transcribed from genetically different alleles, control SMN levels were relatively similar. In contrast, the degree of SMN depletion between tissues in SMA varied substantially over time and between the two models. These findings offer an explanation for the differential vulnerability of tissues and organs observed in SMA and further our understanding of the systemic and temporal requirements for SMN with direct relevance for developing effective therapies for SMA.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExonsHumansMiceMotor NeuronsMuscular Atrophy, SpinalRNA SplicingSpinal CordSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinSMN1 protein, humanSmn1 protein, mouseSMN2 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID29790918
PMCPMC6077828
OpenAlexW2803950888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.