Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29790870›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Genetic disorders and mortality in infancy and early childhood: delayed diagnoses and missed opportunities.

Monica H Wojcik, Talia S Schwartz, Inbar Yamin, Heather L Edward, Casie A Genetti, Meghan C Towne, Pankaj B Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Rapid genomic sequencing in the NICU: Who to test and why.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic delay in monogenic disease: A scoping review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of genomic medicine and implementing equitable access for critically ill infants in neonatal intensive care units.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Implications of Genomic Newborn Screening for Infant Mortality.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica H WojcikDivision of Newborn Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Monica.Wojcik@childrens.harvard.edu.
Talia S SchwartzDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Inbar YaminDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Heather L EdwardDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Casie A GenettiDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Meghan C TowneDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pankaj B AgrawalDivision of Newborn Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. pagrawal@enders.tch.harvard.edu.

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN GENETICST32GM007748 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, Louise Wilkins-Haug · 1985 to 2026
$12.0M
Training Program in Newborn and Developmental DiseasesT32HD007466 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI KOUREMBANAS, STELLA · 1994 to 2016
$8.0M
Genome Sequence-Based Screening for Childhood Risk and Newborn IllnessU19HD077671 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEGGS, ALAN H., GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2018
$6.1M
SPEG is Critical in Skeletal Muscle Development and FunctionR01AR068429 · NIAMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI AGRAWAL, PANKAJ B · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR068429NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007466NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD077671NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInfants admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) who do not survive early childhood are a population that is probably enriched for rare genetic disease; we therefore characterized their genetic diagnostic evaluation.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of infants admitted to our NICU between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2015 who were deceased at the time of records review, with age at death less than 5 years.

resultsA total of 2,670 infants were admitted; 170 later died. One hundred six of 170 (62%) had an evaluation for a genetic or metabolic disorder. Forty-seven of 170 (28%) had laboratory-confirmed genetic diagnoses, although 14/47 (30%) diagnoses were made postmortem. Infants evaluated for a genetic disorder spent more time in the NICU (median 13.5 vs. 5.0 days; p = 0.003), were older at death (median 92.0 vs. 17.5 days; p < 0.001), and had similarly high rates of redirection of care (86% vs. 79%; p = 0.28).

conclusionGenetic disorders were suspected in many infants but found in a minority. Approximately one-third of diagnosed infants died before a laboratory-confirmed genetic diagnosis was made. This highlights the need to improve genetic diagnostic evaluation in the NICU, particularly to support end-of-life decision making.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisInfant MortalityChildFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalediagnostic odysseygenetic diagnosisinfancymortalityneonatal intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID29790870
PMCPMC6185816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.