ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018
Environmental Stability of Plasmonic Biosensors Based on Natural versus Artificial Antibody.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Magnetic Microbeads Equipped with Temperature-Responsive Artificial Antibodies for Efficient Anticancer Drug Administration.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Recent advances in aptamer-based biosensing technology for isolation and detection of extracellular vesicles.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- A plasmonic biosensor pre-diagnostic tool for Familial Mediterranean Fever.Nature communications · 2024Article
- β-BiNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular Thermal Motion Modulated Room-Temperature Phosphorescence for Multilevel Encryption.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Review
- Stabilization of surface-bound antibodies for ELISA based on a reversable zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 coating.Journal of colloid and interface science · 2021Article
- Refreshable Nanobiosensor Based on Organosilica Encapsulation of Biorecognition Elements.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Plasmonic biosensors based on the refractive index sensitivity of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) are considered to be highly promising for on-chip and point-of-care biodiagnostics. However, most of the current plasmonic biosensors employ natural antibodies as biorecognition elements, which can easily lose their biorecognition ability upon exposure to environmental stressors (e.g., temperature and humidity). Plasmonic biosensors relying on molecular imprints as recognition elements (artificial antibodies) are hypothesized to be an attractive alternative for applications in resource-limited settings due to their excellent thermal, chemical, and environmental stability. In this work, we provide a comprehensive comparison of the stability of plasmonic biosensors based on natural and artificial antibodies. Although the natural antibody-based plasmonic biosensors exhibit superior sensitivity, their stability (temporal, thermal, and chemical) was found to be vastly inferior to those based on artificial antibodies. Our results convincingly demonstrate that these novel classes of artificial antibody-based plasmonic biosensors are highly attractive for point-of-care and resource-limited conditions where tight control over transport, storage, and handling conditions is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.