Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789983›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2018

Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy.

Manu L N G Malbrain, Niels Van Regenmortel, Bernd Saugel, Brecht De Tavernier, Pieter-Jan Van Gaal, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Jean-Louis Teboul, Todd W Rice, Monty Mythen, Xavier Monnet

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 269 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
51.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05211765 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Association of Respiratory Variation of Superior Vena Cava in Transthoracic View and Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ChileRan2021 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsShockArmsSuperior vena cava transthoracic evaluation
NCT05658692 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Platform Adaptive Embedded Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsprotective ventilation, prone position ventilation, glucocorticoid therapy, restrictive fluid resuscitation, Thymosin Alpha
NCT06216119 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Intrarenal Venous Flow Change During Fluid Removal in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Exploratory Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled52ConditionsCritical Illness, Fluid Overload
NCT07481097 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Hemodynamic Resuscitation Guided by Non-Invasive Mean Systemic Filling Pressure to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial Integrating Renal Doppler Indices

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury Due to SepsisArmsHemodynamic measurements during reduction in Norepinephrine and fluid boli.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 586 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Restrictive fluids versus standard care in adults with sepsis in the emergency department (REFACED): A multicenter, randomized feasibility trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Manu L N G MalbrainIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium. manu.malbrain@uzbrussel.be.
Niels Van RegenmortelIntensive Care Unit, ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, 2060, Antwerpen 6, Belgium.
Bernd SaugelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Brecht De TavernierIntensive Care Unit, ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, 2060, Antwerpen 6, Belgium.
Pieter-Jan Van GaalIntensive Care Unit, ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, 2060, Antwerpen 6, Belgium.
Olivier Joannes-BoyauService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation 2, CHU Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Louis TeboulMedical Intensive Care Unit, Hopitaux universitaires Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Todd W RiceUniversity College London Hospitals, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Monty MythenDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xavier MonnetMedical Intensive Care Unit, Hopitaux universitaires Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg · BEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Ouest · FRNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversität Hamburg · DEVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with septic shock, the administration of fluids during initial hemodynamic resuscitation remains a major therapeutic challenge. We are faced with many open questions regarding the type, dose and timing of intravenous fluid administration. There are only four major indications for intravenous fluid administration: aside from resuscitation, intravenous fluids have many other uses including maintenance and replacement of total body water and electrolytes, as carriers for medications and for parenteral nutrition. In this paradigm-shifting review, we discuss different fluid management strategies including early adequate goal-directed fluid management, late conservative fluid management and late goal-directed fluid removal. In addition, we expand on the concept of the "four D's" of fluid therapy, namely drug, dosing, duration and de-escalation. During the treatment of patients with septic shock, four phases of fluid therapy should be considered in order to provide answers to four basic questions. These four phases are the resuscitation phase, the optimization phase, the stabilization phase and the evacuation phase. The four questions are "When to start intravenous fluids?", "When to stop intravenous fluids?", "When to start de-resuscitation or active fluid removal?" and finally "When to stop de-resuscitation?" In analogy to the way we handle antibiotics in critically ill patients, it is time for fluid stewardship.

Indexed as

AntibioticsDe-escalationDe-resuscitationDoseDrugDurationFluid managementFluid responsivenessFluidsFluid stewardshipFluid therapyFour D’sFour hitsFour indicationsFour phasesFour questionsGoal-directed therapyMaintenanceMonitoringPassive leg raisingReplacementResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID29789983
PMCPMC5964054
OpenAlexW2807356795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.