Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789977›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2018

Effect of missing data on multitask prediction methods.

Antonio de la Vega de León, Beining Chen, Valerie J Gillet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Large-Scale Modeling of Sparse Protein Kinase Activity Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recent Advances in In Silico Target Fishing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonio de la Vega de LeónInformation School, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK. a.vega@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-2099
Beining ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Dainton Building, Brook Hill, Sheffield, S3 7HF, UK.
Valerie J GilletInformation School, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 612347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in multitask prediction in chemoinformatics, helped by the increasing use of deep neural networks in this field. This technique is applied to multitarget data sets, where compounds have been tested against different targets, with the aim of developing models to predict a profile of biological activities for a given compound. However, multitarget data sets tend to be sparse; i.e., not all compound-target combinations have experimental values. There has been little research on the effect of missing data on the performance of multitask methods. We have used two complete data sets to simulate sparseness by removing data from the training set. Different models to remove the data were compared. These sparse sets were used to train two different multitask methods, deep neural networks and Macau, which is a Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization technique. Results from both methods were remarkably similar and showed that the performance decrease because of missing data is at first small before accelerating after large amounts of data are removed. This work provides a first approximation to assess how much data is required to produce good performance in multitask prediction exercises.

Indexed as

Deep neural networksMacauMissing dataMultitask predictionSparse data sets

Identifiers

PMID29789977
PMCPMC5964064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.