Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789972›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2018

Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Predicted by Ki67.

C G Genç, M Falconi, S Partelli, F Muffatti, S van Eeden, C Doglioni, H J Klümpen, C H J van Eijck, E J M Nieveen van Dijkum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A nomogram incorporating Ki67 to predict survival of acral melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C G GençDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M FalconiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Research Institute, Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy.
S PartelliPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Research Institute, Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy.
F MuffattiPancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Research Institute, Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy.
S van EedenDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C DoglioniDepartment of Pathology, Scientific Institute, San Raffaele Hospital, University Vita e Salute, Milan, Italy.
H J KlümpenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E J M Nieveen van DijkumDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.j.nieveenvandijkum@amc.uva.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite evidence of different malignant potentials, postoperative follow-up assessment is similar for G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and adjuvant treatment currently is not indicated. This study investigated the role of Ki67 with regard to recurrence and survival after curative resection of panNET.

methodsPatients with resected non-functioning panNET diagnosed between 1992 and 2016 from three institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had G1 or G2 tumor without distant metastases or hereditary syndromes were included in the study. The patients were re-categorized into Ki67 0-5 and Ki67 6-20%. Cox regression analysis with log-rank testing for recurrence and survival was performed.

resultsThe study enrolled 241 patients (86%) with Ki67 0-5% and 39 patients (14%) with Ki67 6-20%. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (14%) with Ki67 0-5% after a median period of 34 months and in 16 patients (41%) with Ki67 6-20% after a median period of 16 months (p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free and 10-year disease-specific survival periods were respectively 90 and 91% for Ki67 0-5% and respectively 55 and 26% for Ki67 6-20% (p < 0.001). The overall survival period after recurrence was 44.9 months, which was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.283). In addition to a Ki67 rate higher than 5%, tumor larger than 4 cm and lymph node metastases were independently associated with recurrence.

conclusionsPatients at high risk for recurrence after curative resection of G1 or G2 panNET can be identified by a Ki67 rate higher than 5%. These patients should be more closely monitored postoperatively to detect recurrence early and might benefit from adjuvant treatment. A clear postoperative follow-up regimen is proposed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKi-67 AntigenLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29789972
PMCPMC6028862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.