Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789970›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2018

Motile Dendritic Cells Sense and Respond to Substrate Geometry.

Amy C Bendell, Nicholas Anderson, Daniel Blumenthal, Edward K Williamson, Christopher S Chen, Janis K Burkhardt, Daniel A Hammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unraveling the Mechanobiology of the Immune System.Advanced healthcare materials · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy C BendellDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicholas AndersonDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel BlumenthalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Edward K WilliamsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christopher S ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Janis K BurkhardtDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel A HammerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. hammer@seas.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-3154

Funding

Using micropost arrays to measure traction forces during dendritic cell motilityR01GM104287 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAMMER, DANIEL A · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
National Institutes of Health GM104287National Science Foundation DGE-1321851NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cell (DC) migration is required for efficient presentation of antigen to T cells and the initiation of an adaptive immune response. In spite of its importance, many aspects of DC migration have not been characterized. DCs encounter a variety of environments with different stiffness and geometry, but the effect of these parameters on DC migration has not yet been determined. We addressed this question by comparing DC motility on standard migration surfaces (polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated coverslips) and micropost array detectors (mPADs). These two surfaces differ in both stiffness and geometry. We found that DC migration was affected by substrate type, with significant increases in speed and significant decreases in persistence time on mPADs made of PDMS as compared to spin-coated PDMS coverslips. To determine whether the geometry or compliance of the post arrays was responsible for these changes in DC migration, we quantified DC motility on mPADs of identical geometry but different stiffness. Migration was indistinguishable on these mPADs, suggesting that DCs are responsive to geometry of ligand presentation and not stiffness. Further, by micropatterning ligands on flat PDMS surfaces in similar geometries to the mPAD arrays, we determined that DCs respond to the geometry of printed ligand. Finally, we used a variety of small molecule inhibitors to identify pathways involved in geometry sensing. We saw a significant role for myosin contractility and α

Indexed as

Cell MovementActin CytoskeletonAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionDendritic CellsDimethylpolysiloxanesIntegrinsMice, Inbred C57BLMyosinsbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesIntegrinsMyosinsActinDendritic cellsGeometryMechanosensingMigrationmPADStiffness

Identifiers

PMID29789970
PMCPMC6095716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.