Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789945›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2018

Remote monitoring of vibrational information in spider webs.

B Mortimer, A Soler, C R Siviour, F Vollrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In situ three-dimensional spider web construction and mechanics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Extended cognition in plants: is it possible?Plant signaling & behavior · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B MortimerDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. beth.mortimer@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-3647
A SolerDepartment Continuum Mechanics and Structural Analysis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
C R SiviourDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
F VollrathDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550- 15-1-0264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiders are fascinating model species to study information-acquisition strategies, with the web acting as an extension of the animal's body. Here, we compare the strategies of two orb-weaving spiders that acquire information through vibrations transmitted and filtered in the web. Whereas Araneus diadematus monitors web vibration directly on the web, Zygiella x-notata uses a signal thread to remotely monitor web vibration from a retreat, which gives added protection. We assess the implications of these two information-acquisition strategies on the quality of vibration information transfer, using laser Doppler vibrometry to measure vibrations of real webs and finite element analysis in computer models of webs. We observed that the signal thread imposed no biologically relevant time penalty for vibration propagation. However, loss of energy (attenuation) was a cost associated with remote monitoring via a signal thread. The findings have implications for the biological use of vibrations by spiders, including the mechanisms to locate and discriminate between vibration sources. We show that orb-weaver spiders are fascinating examples of organisms that modify their physical environment to shape their information-acquisition strategy.

Indexed as

Remote Sensing TechnologySilkVibrationAnimalsLaser-Doppler FlowmetryPredatory BehaviorSpidersSilkCommunicated by: Sven ThatjeFEA modelOrb webSpiderVibrationVibrometry

Identifiers

PMID29789945
PMCPMC5978847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.