ArticlePediatric cardiology2018
A Potential Diagnostic Approach for Foetal Long-QT Syndrome, Developed and Validated in Children.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left Ventricular Contraction Duration Is the Most Powerful Predictor of Cardiac Events in LQTS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Congenital long QT syndrome: A challenging diagnosis by fetal echocardiography.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with Long-QT Syndrome (LQTS), mechanical abnormalities have been described. Recognition of these abnormalities could potentially be used in the diagnosis of LQTS, especially in the foetus where an ECG is not available and DNA-analysis is invasive. We aimed to develop and validate a marker for these mechanical abnormalities in children and to test its feasibility in foetuses as a proof of principle. We measured the myocardial contraction duration using colour Tissue Doppler Imaging (cTDI) in 41 LQTS children and age- and gender-matched controls. Children were chosen to develop and validate the measurement of the myocardial contraction duration, due to the availability of a simultaneously recorded ECG. Feasibility of this measurement in foetuses was tested in an additional pilot study among seven LQTS foetuses and eight controls. LQTS children had a longer myocardial contraction duration compared to controls, while there was no statistical difference in heart rate. Measuring the myocardial contraction duration in children had a high inter- and intra-observer validity and reliably correlated with the QT-interval. There was an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71, and the optimal cut-off value showed an especially high specificity in diagnosing LQTS. Measuring the myocardial contraction duration was possible in all foetuses and had a high inter- and intra-observer validity (ICC = 0.71 and ICC = 0.88, respectively). LQTS foetuses seemed to have a longer myocardial contraction duration compared to controls. Therefore, a prolonged contraction duration may be a potential marker for the prenatal diagnosis of LQTS in the future. Further studies are required to support the measurement of the myocardial contraction duration as a diagnostic approach for foetal LQTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.