ArticleSpinal cord2018
The natural course of passive tenodesis grip in individuals with spinal cord injury with preserved wrist extension power but paralyzed fingers and thumbs.
Article in Spinal cord, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Association of Tenodesis Grip Strength With Functional Hand Recovery in Patients With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulations With and Without Motor Priming Exercises on Tenodesis Grip in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of wrist extensor muscle recovery following acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A model systems replication study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Operant Conditioning of the Motor Evoked Potential in Forearm Extensors of Individuals with Chronic Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Case Studies.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The Clinical Management of Electrical Stimulation Therapies in the Rehabilitation of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injuries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Effect of a Modified Tenodesis Wrist-hand Orthosis on Hand Function in Patients With Tetraplegia.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2024Article
- Electrical Stimulation Exercise for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Healthcare Provider Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional.
objectivesTo investigate the natural course of passive tenodesis grip in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with no experience of tenodesis splint application and the related factors for success of the grip.
settingCommunity-dwelling persons with chronic SCI in South Korea.
methodsIndividuals with cervical SCI with preserved wrist extensor power, but completely paralyzed fingers and thumbs, were recruited. For each hand, success or failure of passive tenodesis lateral grip was assessed both in the opening and closing phase. The key task in the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) test was also assessed.
resultsFifty-eight hands of 37 individuals with SCI were analyzed. In 35 of the 58 hands, both opening and closing phases of the grip were achieved. During the closing phase of the passive tenodesis lateral grip, the mean (s.d.) value of the second MP joint flexion angle (°) in the success group was 55.1 (13.6), compared to 38.6 (17.8) in the failure group. The key task in GRASSP was completed in only 14 out of 58 hands. Hands with a wrist extensor power of grade 4 or 5 on a manual muscle test showed higher GRASSP scores than those with a grade 3 wrist extensor power.
conclusionsThe passive tenodesis lateral grip can be achieved in a large number of hands without splint application after SCI, but its use in the key task of the GRASSP is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29789707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.