Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Distribution of different surface modified carbon dots in pumpkin seedlings.

Kun Qian, Huiyuan Guo, Guangcai Chen, Chuanxin Ma, Baoshan Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nanoplatforms for the Delivery of Nucleic Acids into Plant Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kun QianCollege of plant protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China. qiankun1982@163.com.
Huiyuan GuoStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Guangcai ChenResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311400, China.
Chuanxin MaStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Baoshan XingStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2028-1295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution of surface modified carbon dots (CDs) in the pumpkin seedlings was studied by visualization techniques and their potential phytotoxicity was investigated at both the physiological and biochemical levels. The average size of carbon dots was approximately 4 nm. The fluorescent peaks of bared CDs, CD-PEI and CD-PAA were between 420 nm and 500 nm, indicating CDs could emit blue and green fluorescence. Fluorescent images showed that all three types of CDs could accumulate in the pumpkin roots and translocate to the shoots, although the distribution pattern of each CDs was obviously different. At the biochemical level, the elevated antioxidant enzymes in pumpkin roots suggest that all the CDs could potentially trigger the antioxidant defense systems in pumpkin seedlings. Additionally, such alteration was greater in the roots than in the shoots. Our study represents a new perspective on CD visualization in plant tissues and provide useful information for the potential toxicity of different types of CDs to terrestrial plants, which is of importance to agricultural application.

Indexed as

CarbonCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCucurbitaFluorescenceNanoparticlesPlant RootsQuantum DotsSeedlingsSurface PropertiesCarbonCoated Materials, Biocompatible

Identifiers

PMID29789656
PMCPMC5964243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.