Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789589›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Characterization of different bubble formulations for blood-brain barrier opening using a focused ultrasound system with acoustic feedback control.

Chenchen Bing, Yu Hong, Christopher Hernandez, Megan Rich, Bingbing Cheng, Imalka Munaweera, Debra Szczepanski, Yin Xi, Mark Bolding, Agata Exner and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precise antibody delivery to the brain via nanobubble-actuated focused ultrasound alleviates depression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Targeting diffuse midline gliomas: The promise of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chenchen BingDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. chenchen.bing@utsouthwestern.edu.
Yu HongDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Christopher HernandezDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0380-7136
Megan RichDivision of Advanced Medical Imaging Research, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Bingbing ChengDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1336-4781
Imalka MunaweeraDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Debra SzczepanskiDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Yin XiDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Mark BoldingDivision of Advanced Medical Imaging Research, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Agata ExnerDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Rajiv ChopraDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3605-6076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound combined with bubble-based agents serves as a non-invasive way to open the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Passive acoustic detection was well studied recently to monitor the acoustic emissions induced by the bubbles under ultrasound energy, but the ability to perform reliable BBB opening with a real-time feedback control algorithm has not been fully evaluated. This study focuses on characterizing the acoustic emissions of different types of bubbles: Optison, Definity, and a custom-made nanobubble. Their performance on reliable BBB opening under real-time feedback control based on acoustic detection was evaluated both in-vitro and in-vivo. The experiments were conducted using a 0.5 MHz focused ultrasound transducer with in-vivo focal pressure ranges from 0.1-0.7 MPa. Successful feedback control was achieved with all three agents when combining with infusion injection. Localized opening was confirmed with Evans blue dye leakage. Microscopic images were acquired to review the opening effects. Under similar total gas volume, nanobubble showed a more reliable opening effect compared to Optison and Definity (p < 0.05). The conclusions obtained from this study confirm the possibilities of performing stable opening using a feedback control algorithm combined with infusion injection. It also opens another potential research area of BBB opening using sub-micron bubbles.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesSonicationAcousticsAlgorithmsAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCell Membrane PermeabilityDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignFeasibility StudiesFeedbackFemaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID29789589
PMCPMC5964106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.