Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789560›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Kin discrimination allows plants to modify investment towards pollinator attraction.

Rubén Torices, José M Gómez, John R Pannell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. B Cell Aberrance in Lupus: the Ringleader and the Solution.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Individuality, self and sociality of vascular plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Characterization of microsatellite markers forApplications in plant sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rubén ToricesDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland. rubentorices@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-1111
José M GómezDepartamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolución. Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Ctra. de Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, Almería, E-04120, Spain.
John R PannellDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-7074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollinators tend to be preferentially attracted to large floral displays that may comprise more than one plant in a patch. Attracting pollinators thus not only benefits individuals investing in advertising, but also other plants in a patch through a 'magnet' effect. Accordingly, there could be an indirect fitness advantage to greater investment in costly floral displays by plants in kin-structured groups than when in groups of unrelated individuals. Here, we seek evidence for this strategy by manipulating relatedness in groups of the plant Moricandia moricandioides, an insect-pollinated herb that typically grows in patches. As predicted, individuals growing with kin, particularly at high density, produced larger floral displays than those growing with non-kin. Investment in attracting pollinators was thus moulded by the presence and relatedness of neighbours, exemplifying the importance of kin recognition in the evolution of plant reproductive strategies.

Indexed as

Plant Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBrassicaceaeFlowersInsectaPollination

Identifiers

PMID29789560
PMCPMC5964244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.