Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789540›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Rapid host strain improvement by in vivo rearrangement of a synthetic yeast chromosome.

B A Blount, G-O F Gowers, J C H Ho, R Ledesma-Amaro, D Jovicevic, R M McKiernan, Z X Xie, B Z Li, Y J Yuan, T Ellis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Golden Gate Cloning for Efficient Biosynthesis of Lycopene in Synthetic Yeast.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B A BlountImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-4782
G-O F GowersImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
J C H HoImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4752-1615
R Ledesma-AmaroImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
D JovicevicImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
R M McKiernanImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Z X XieKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, 300072, Tianjin, PR China.
B Z LiKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, 300072, Tianjin, PR China.
Y J YuanKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, 300072, Tianjin, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-0089
T EllisImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. t.ellis@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-976X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology tools, such as modular parts and combinatorial DNA assembly, are routinely used to optimise the productivity of heterologous metabolic pathways for biosynthesis or substrate utilisation, yet it is well established that host strain background is just as important for determining productivity. Here we report that in vivo combinatorial genomic rearrangement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast with a synthetic chromosome V can rapidly generate new, improved host strains with genetic backgrounds favourable to diverse heterologous pathways, including those for violacein and penicillin biosynthesis and for xylose utilisation. We show how the modular rearrangement of synthetic chromosomes by SCRaMbLE can be easily determined using long-read nanopore sequencing and we explore experimental conditions that optimise diversification and screening. This synthetic genome approach to metabolic engineering provides productivity improvements in a fast, simple and accessible way, making it a valuable addition to existing strain improvement techniques.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalBase SequenceBenchmarkingChromosomes, FungalClone CellsGene EditingGenes, SyntheticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIndolesMetabolic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPenicillinsPlasmidsRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeIndolesPenicillinsviolaceinXylose

Identifiers

PMID29789540
PMCPMC5964169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.