Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789472›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

The Impact of Nutrition and Health Claims on Consumer Perceptions and Portion Size Selection: Results from a Nationally Representative Survey.

Tony Benson, Fiona Lavelle, Tamara Bucher, Amanda McCloat, Elaine Mooney, Bernadette Egan, Clare E Collins, Moira Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Black Chokeberry Extracts (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of Commercial Seaweed Liquid Extract (TAMPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tony BensonInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK. t.benson@qub.ac.uk.
Fiona LavelleInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK. flavelle01@qub.ac.uk.
Tamara BucherSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. tamara.bucher@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-5867
Amanda McCloatDepartment of Home Economics, St. Angela's College, F91 C634 Sligo, Ireland. amccloat@stangelas.nuigalway.ie.
Elaine MooneyDepartment of Home Economics, St. Angela's College, F91 C634 Sligo, Ireland. emooney@stangelas.nuigalway.ie.
Bernadette EganFood, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK. m.egan@surrey.ac.uk.
Clare E CollinsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. clare.collins@newcastle.edu.au.
Moira DeanInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5AG, UK. moira.dean@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition and health claims on foods can help consumers make healthier food choices. However, claims may have a 'halo' effect, influencing consumer perceptions of foods and increasing consumption. Evidence for these effects are typically demonstrated in experiments with small samples, limiting generalisability. The current study aimed to overcome this limitation through the use of a nationally representative survey. In a cross-sectional survey of 1039 adults across the island of Ireland, respondents were presented with three different claims (nutrition claim = "Low in fat"; health claim = "With plant sterols. Proven to lower cholesterol"; satiety claim = "Fuller for longer") on four different foods (cereal, soup, lasagne, and yoghurt). Participants answered questions on perceived healthiness, tastiness, and fillingness of the products with different claims and also selected a portion size they would consume. Claims influenced fillingness perceptions of some of the foods. However, there was little influence of claims on tastiness or healthiness perceptions or the portion size selected. Psychological factors such as consumers' familiarity with foods carrying claims and belief in the claims were the most consistent predictors of perceptions and portion size selection. Future research should identify additional consumer factors that may moderate the relationships between claims, perceptions, and consumption.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorConsumer Health InformationFeeding BehaviorFood LabelingNutritive ValuePerceptionPortion SizeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIrelandMaleconsumerfood labellinghealth claimshealth halonudgingnutrition claimsperceptionsportion size

Identifiers

PMID29789472
PMCPMC5986535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.