Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789364›Full record

ReviewmBio2018

Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Microbial Community Interactions.

Rhea G Abisado, Saida Benomar, Jennifer R Klaus, Ajai A Dandekar, Josephine R Chandler

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 320 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
320citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

320 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of a Novel Quorum QuencherPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Inactivation of MexT inJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  10. How Salmonella Works Under Osmotic and Desiccation Stresses.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rhea G Abisado *Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Saida Benomar *Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Jennifer R Klaus *Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Ajai A DandekarDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Josephine R ChandlerDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA jrchandler@ku.edu.

Funding

Understanding the mechanobiology of stem cells in a microengineered 3D cardiac tissue environment with cardiomyopathyP20GM103638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI HOLMSTROM, ERIK D · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensingR01GM125714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANDEKAR, AJAI · 2018 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103638NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bacteria use a cell-cell communication system called quorum sensing to coordinate population density-dependent changes in behavior. Quorum sensing involves production of and response to diffusible or secreted signals, which can vary substantially across different types of bacteria. In many species, quorum sensing modulates virulence functions and is important for pathogenesis. Over the past half-century, there has been a significant accumulation of knowledge of the molecular mechanisms, signal structures, gene regulons, and behavioral responses associated with quorum-sensing systems in diverse bacteria. More recent studies have focused on understanding quorum sensing in the context of bacterial sociality. Studies of the role of quorum sensing in cooperative and competitive microbial interactions have revealed how quorum sensing coordinates interactions both within a species and between species. Such studies of quorum sensing as a social behavior have relied on the development of "synthetic ecological" models that use nonclonal bacterial populations. In this review, we discuss some of these models and recent advances in understanding how microbes might interact with one another using quorum sensing. The knowledge gained from these lines of investigation has the potential to guide studies of microbial sociality in natural settings and the design of new medicines and therapies to treat bacterial infections.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaQuorum SensingAnimalsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Interactionsantibioticscoculturecompetitioncooperationquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID29789364
PMCPMC5964356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.