Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789141›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Patterns of peritraumatic threat perceptions in patients evaluated for suspected acute coronary syndrome according to prior and current posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Deanna R Zhu, Jacob Julian, Sung J A Lee, Anusorn Thanataveerat, Jennifer A Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Stressing Out About the Heart: A Narrative Review of the Role of Psychological Stress in Acute Cardiovascular Events.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deanna R ZhuCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: Deanna_zhu@med.unc.edu.
Jacob JulianCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Sung J A LeeCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Anusorn ThanataveeratCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Jennifer A SumnerCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Impact of Social-Interpersonal Factors in the ER on PTSD/Cardiac OutcomesR01HL117832 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W., EDMONDSON, DONALD · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
PTSD, Medication Adherence, and Prognosis after Acute Coronary SyndromesR01HL123368 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W., KRONISH, IAN MATTHEW · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Posttraumatic Stress and Cardiovascular Risk in Women: Tests of Biological MechanismsK01HL130650 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUMNER, JENNIFER A · 2016 to 2020
$815k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL130650NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117832NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrior posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and elevated threat perceptions predict posttraumatic psychopathology after evaluation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but most research has measured threat retrospectively. We investigated how threat perceptions during ACS evaluation in the emergency department (ED) and upon recall were associated with posttraumatic psychopathology burden due to prior trauma and the suspected ACS.

methodsPerceived threat was assessed in the ED, and ED threat recall was assessed upon inpatient transfer/discharge, along with acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms due to suspected ACS and PTSD symptoms due to prior trauma. The sample comprised 894 participants (mean age = 60.7 ± 13.1 years; 46.8% female; 56.3% Hispanic; 20.5% Black). One-way ANOVAs examined how those with consistent posttraumatic psychopathology (prior PTSD/ASD; 14.8%), prior posttraumatic psychopathology (prior PTSD/no ASD; 6.8%), new-onset posttraumatic psychopathology (no PTSD/ASD; 15.7%), or no posttraumatic psychopathology (no PTSD/no ASD; 62.8%) differed in threat perception, threat recall, and their discrepancy.

resultsThreat perception scores ranged from 6 to 24. Participants with consistent posttraumatic psychopathology had higher threat perceptions (M = 14.01) than those with prior posttraumatic psychopathology (M = 12.02) and new-onset posttraumatic psychopathology (M = 12.21) (ps ≤ 0.001); the latter two did not differ significantly but had higher threat perceptions than those with no posttraumatic psychopathology (M = 9.84) (p < .001). Similar results were observed for threat recall (p < .001). The new-onset posttraumatic psychopathology group also had a greater increase in perceived threat versus the no posttraumatic psychopathology group (p = .06). Results were similar adjusting for potential confounders.

conclusionsAssessing threat perceptions during ACS evaluation and hospitalization may help identify those at risk for emotional difficulties post-ACS.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress Disorders, Traumatic, AcuteAcute coronary syndromeAcute stress disorderPosttraumatic stress disorderThreat perceptions

Identifiers

PMID29789141
PMCPMC6388421
OpenAlexW2799851637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.