Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789018›Full record

SynthesisSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2018

Pain clinic definitions in the medical literature and U.S. state laws: an integrative systematic review and comparison.

Barbara Andraka-Christou, Joshua B Rager, Brittany Brown-Podgorski, Ross D Silverman, Dennis P Watson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Andraka-ChristouDepartment of Health Management and Informatics, College of Health and Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, 4364 Scorpius Street, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA. Barbara.andraka@ucf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6307-6369
Joshua B RagerSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, 340 W 10th St #6200, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Brittany Brown-PodgorskiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Ross D SilvermanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Dennis P WatsonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

INDIANA PRESCRIPTION DRUG OVERDOSE PREVENTION FOR STATESU17CE002721 · CE · INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH · PI CHAUHAN, REBECCA · 2016 to 2016
$1.4M
CDC HHS 1U17CE002721NCIPC CDC HHS U17 CE002721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to widespread opioid misuse, ten U.S. states have implemented regulations for facilities that primarily manage and treat chronic pain, called "pain clinics." Whether a clinic falls into a state's pain clinic definition determines the extent to which it is subject to oversight. It is unclear whether state pain clinic definitions model those found in the medical literature, and potential differences lead to discrepancies between scientific and professionally guided advice found in the medical literature and actual pain clinic practice. Identifying discrepancies could assist states to design laws that are more compatible with best practices suggested in the medical literature.

methodsWe conducted an integrative systematic review to create a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions using academic medical literature. We then identified existing U.S. state pain clinic statutes and regulations and compared the developed taxonomy using a content analysis approach to understand the extent to which medical literature definitions are reflected in state policy.

resultsIn the medical literature, we identified eight categories of pain clinic definitions: 1) patient case mix; 2) single-modality treatment; 3) multidisciplinary treatment; 4) interdisciplinary treatment; 5) provider supervision; 6) provider composition; 7) marketing; and 8) outcome. We identified ten states with pain clinic laws. State laws primarily include the following definitional categories: patient case mix; single-modality treatment, and marketing. Some definitional categories commonly found in the medical literature, such as multidisciplinary treatment and interdisciplinary treatment, rarely appear in state law definitions.

conclusionsThis is the first study to our knowledge to develop a taxonomy of pain clinic definitions and to identify differences between pain clinic definitions in U.S. state law and medical literature. Future work should explore the impact of different legal pain clinic definitions on provider decision-making and state-level health outcomes.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicHumansPain ClinicsContent analysisIntegrative reviewPain clinicPain treatment, opioid, state policySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29789018
PMCPMC5964673
OpenAlexW2805869325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.