Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789017›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Leveraging routine clinical materials and mobile technology to assess CBT fidelity: the Innovative Methods to Assess Psychotherapy Practices (imAPP) study.

Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, Luana Marques, Torrey A Creed, Cassidy A Gutner, Robert DeRubeis, Paul G Barnett, Eric Kuhn, Michael Suvak, Jason Owen, Dawne Vogt and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03479398 (Leveraging Routine Clinical Materials and Mobile Technology to Assess CBT Quality), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03479398 unknown statusnot on this map

Leveraging Routine Clinical Materials and Mobile Technology to Assess CBT Quality

TypeobservationalSponsorPalo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchRan2017 to 2023Enrolled439ConditionsMobile Application-Based CBT Worksheet Collection, Paper-Based Worksheet CollectionArmsCognitive Behavioral Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Empirical Distillation of Three Manualized Treatments.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon Wiltsey StirmanNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. sws1@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9917-5078
Luana MarquesHarvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, 70 Everett Ave., Chelsea, MA, 02150, USA.
Torrey A CreedUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Suite 3038, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Cassidy A GutnerNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, 150 S. Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Robert DeRubeisSchool of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Ave., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Paul G BarnettPalo Alto Veterans Institute for Research, 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Eric KuhnNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Michael SuvakSuffolk University, 73 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
Jason OwenNational Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Dawne VogtNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, 150 S. Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Booil JoStanford University, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sonja SchoenwaldOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
Clara JohnsonNational Center for PTSD, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Kera MallardNational Center for PTSD, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Matthew BeristianosNational Center for PTSD, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Heidi La BashNational Center for PTSD, 795 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
National Center for PTSD · USBoston University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USHarvard University · USOregon Social Learning Center · USPalo Alto Veterans Institute for Research · USStanford University · USSuffolk University · US

Funding

Leveraging Routine Clinical Materials and Mobile Technology to Assess CBT QualityR01MH112628 · NIMH · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI WILTSEY STIRMAN, SHANNON · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112628NIMH NIH HHS R01MH112628-01NIMH NIH HHS R21MH097022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying scalable strategies for assessing fidelity is a key challenge in implementation science. However, for psychosocial interventions, the existing, reliable ways to test treatment fidelity quality are often labor intensive, and less burdensome strategies may not reflect actual clinical practice. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) provide clinicians with a set of effective core elements to help treat a multitude of disorders, which, evidence suggests, need to be delivered with fidelity to maximize potential client impact. The current "gold standard" for rating CBTs is rating recordings of therapy sessions, which is extremely time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of initial training. Although CBTs can vary based on the target disorder, one common element employed in most CBTs is the use of worksheets to identify specific behaviors and thoughts that affect a client's ability to recover. The present study will develop and evaluate an innovative new approach to rate CBT fidelity, by developing a universal CBT scoring system based on worksheets completed in therapy sessions.

methodsTo develop a scoring system for CBT worksheets, we will compile common CBT elements from a variety of CBT worksheets for a range of psychiatric disorders and create adherence and competence measures. We will collect archival worksheets from past studies to test the scoring system and assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate whether CBT worksheet scoring accurately reflects clinician fidelity, we will recruit clinicians who are engaged in a CBT for depression, anxiety, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinicians and clients will transmit routine therapy materials produced in session (e.g., worksheets, clinical notes, session recordings) to the study team after each session. We will compare observer-rated fidelity, clinical notes, and fidelity-rated worksheets to identify the most effective and efficient method to assess clinician fidelity. Clients will also be randomly assigned to either complete the CBT worksheets on paper forms or on a mobile application (app) to learn if worksheet format influences clinician and client experience or differs in terms of reflecting fidelity. DISCUSSION: Scoring fidelity using CBT worksheets may allow clinics to test fidelity in a short and effective manner, enhancing continuous quality improvement in the workplace. Clinicians and clinics can use such data to improve clinician fidelity in real time, leading to improved patient outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03479398 . Retrospectively registered March 20, 2018.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyHealth Plan ImplementationHumansPsychotherapyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBehavioral healthFidelityMeasurement

Identifiers

PMID29789017
PMCPMC5964900
OpenAlexW2807698120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.