Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29789015›Full record

ReviewMicrobiome2018

Pharmacomicrobiomics: exploiting the drug-microbiota interactions in anticancer therapies.

Concetta Panebianco, Angelo Andriulli, Valerio Pazienza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Concetta PanebiancoDivision of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Angelo AndriulliDivision of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Valerio PazienzaDivision of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, Viale dei Cappuccini, 1, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy. pazienza_valerio@yahoo.it.

Funding

Ministero della Salute RC1503GA40Ministero della Salute RC1703GA31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a major health burden worldwide, and despite continuous advances in medical therapies, resistance to standard drugs and adverse effects still represent an important cause of therapeutic failure. There is a growing evidence that gut bacteria can affect the response to chemo- and immunotherapeutic drugs by modulating either efficacy or toxicity. Moreover, intratumor bacteria have been shown to modulate chemotherapy response. At the same time, anticancer treatments themselves significantly affect the microbiota composition, thus disrupting homeostasis and exacerbating discomfort to the patient. Here, we review the existing knowledge concerning the role of the microbiota in mediating chemo- and immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity and the ability of these therapeutic options to trigger dysbiotic condition contributing to the severity of side effects. In addition, we discuss the use of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and antibiotics as emerging strategies for manipulating the microbiota in order to improve therapeutic outcome or at least ensure patients a better quality of life all along of anticancer treatments.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBacteriaDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinesNeoplasmsPrebioticsProbioticsSynbioticsAntineoplastic AgentsPrebioticsCancerChemotherapyImmunotherapyMetagenomicsMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID29789015
PMCPMC5964925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.