Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788972›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Inequity in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care in Yangon region, Myanmar: a cross-sectional study.

Aye Nyein Moe Myint, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Thein Thein Htay, Myint Myint Wai, Johanne Sundby, Espen Bjertness

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Wealth and Education Inequities in Maternal and Child Health Services Utilization in Rural Ethiopia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aye Nyein Moe MyintInternational Relations Division, Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Tippawan LiabsuetrakulEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. ltippawa@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7687-5629
Thein Thein HtayMinistry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Myint Myint WaiDepartment of Medical Services (Planning), Ministry of Health and Sports, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Johanne SundbyDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen BjertnessDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ministry of Health and Sports · MMUniversity of Oslo · NOPrince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

the Norwegian Programme for Capacity Development in Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED) MMY-13/0049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEquity of access to and utilization of healthcare across socio-economic groups is important to achieve universal health coverage. Although the utilization of antenatal and delivery care has been increasing in low- and middle-income countries, inequities in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care have been reported in many countries, but have not yet been studied in Myanmar. This study aimed to determine whether inequities in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care existed in Yangon region, Myanmar.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional survey using multistage sampling was conducted from October to November 2016. A wealth index was selected as the main socioeconomic parameter for measuring inequities with respect to early initiation of antenatal care (ANC), number of antenatal care visits, delivery by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) and delivery by cesarean section (CS). Inequities were evaluated using concentration curves and concentration indexes.

resultsOf the 762 women who gave birth within the 12-month survey period, there was no evidence of inequity in utilization of ANC; however, inequity of at least one antenatal visit among women aged less than 20 years was found with a concentration index of 0.04. The concentration indexes for delivery by SBA and CS were 0.05 and 0.14, respectively. Delivery by CS was disproportionately higher in adolescents and women with higher education than middle school.

conclusionThere was no overall inequity in the utilization of ANC but substantial inequities in delivery by CS and SBA were shown. Social determinants of health, particularly age and education, were associated with inequities in the utilization of delivery care. Adolescent pregnant women were found to be particularly vulnerable, and thus should be a target group for strategic plans to reduce inequities in utilization of delivery care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncomeMaternal Health ServicesMyanmarPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsUniversal Health InsuranceAntenatal careConcentration indexDelivery careInequityWealth index

Identifiers

PMID29788972
PMCPMC5964903
OpenAlexW2806343464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.