Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788802›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2018

Acute effects of inhaled menthol on the rewarding effects of intravenous nicotine in smokers.

Gerald W Valentine, Elise E DeVito, Peter I Jatlow, Ralitza Gueorguieva, Mehmet Sofuoglu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The effects of inhaled flavors on intravenous nicotine.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differences in Cognitive Task Performance, Reinforcement Enhancement, and Nicotine Dependence Between Menthol and Nonmenthol Cigarette Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerald W Valentine1 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-8543
Elise E DeVito1 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Peter I Jatlow1 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ralitza Gueorguieva4 Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mehmet Sofuoglu1 Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceP50DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNAN-SARIN, SUCHITRA, O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 2013 to 2017
$20.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis double-blind, placebo controlled study examined whether menthol inhaled from an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) would change subjective and withdrawal alleviating effects of intravenous nicotine in young adult smokers.

methodsA total of 32 menthol-preferring smokers and 25 non-menthol-preferring smokers participated in the study that consisted of a random sequence of three different inhaled menthol conditions (0.0%, 0.5%, and 3.2%) across three test sessions (a single menthol condition per session). In each test session (performed at least 24 hours apart), a random order of saline, and two different nicotine infusions of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg/70 kg of bodyweight were administered, one hour apart, concurrent with menthol inhalation.

resultsWhile menthol did not alter the positive subjective effects of nicotine, menthol significantly enhanced aversive effects of nicotine in non-menthol-preferring smokers and reduced smoking urges in menthol-preferring smokers. In addition, menthol-preferring smokers reported blunted positive subjective responses to nicotine and less severe nicotine withdrawal after overnight nicotine deprivation. Finally, compared to non-menthol-preferring smokers, menthol-preferring smokers had a significantly lower baseline nicotine metabolite ratio indicating slower nicotine metabolism within our sample of menthol-preferring smokers.

conclusionsOur findings did not support an enhancement of nicotine's positive subjective effects from inhaled menthol. However, as compared to non-menthol-preferring smokers, menthol-preferring smokers had blunted positive subjective responses to nicotine and reduced overnight withdrawal severity that may be partly due to inhibition of nicotine metabolism from chronic exposure to inhaled menthol. Collectively, these results reveal a more complex and nuanced role of inhaled menthol in smokers than previously recognized.

Indexed as

RewardAdministration, InhalationAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug InteractionsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleFlavoring AgentsHumansMaleMentholNicotineSmokersFlavoring AgentsMentholNicotineSmoking Cessation AgentsMentholnicotinenicotine metabolite ratioreinforcementsmoking

Identifiers

PMID29788802
PMCPMC6329876
OpenAlexW2803636644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.