Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788332›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Constitutive Interferon Pathway Activation in Tumors as an Efficacy Determinant Following Oncolytic Virotherapy.

Cheyne Kurokawa, Ianko D Iankov, S Keith Anderson, Ileana Aderca, Alexey A Leontovich, Matthew J Maurer, Ann L Oberg, Mark A Schroeder, Caterina Giannini, Suzanne M Greiner and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Oncolytic viruses as cancer therapeutics: From mechanistic insights to clinical translation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cheyne KurokawaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ianko D IankovDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
S Keith AndersonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ileana AdercaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Alexey A LeontovichDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Matthew J MaurerDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ann L ObergDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mark A SchroederDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Suzanne M GreinerDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Marc A BeckerDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
E Aubrey ThompsonCancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Paul HaluskaDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mark E JentoftDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Ian F ParneyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
S John WerohaDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jin JenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Evanthia GalanisDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ELLEN L. GOODE · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
Targeted MV-CEA as a Potent Antitumor Agent against GBMP50CA108961 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2004 to 2015
$22.5M
Optimizing Delivery of Oncolytic Measles Virus Strains with Cell CarriersR01CA200507 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GALANIS, EVANTHIA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Measles Virotherapy and radiovirotherapy in the Treatment of recurrent gliomasR01CA154348 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GALANIS, EVANTHIA · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108961NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154348NCI NIH HHS R01 CA200507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Attenuated measles virus (MV) strains are promising agents currently being tested against solid tumors or hematologic malignancies in ongoing phase I and II clinical trials; factors determining oncolytic virotherapy success remain poorly understood, however. Methods: We performed RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis to identify pathways differentially activated in MV-resistant (n = 3) and -permissive (n = 2) tumors derived from resected human glioblastoma (GBM) specimens and propagated as xenografts (PDX). Using a unique gene signature we identified, we generated a diagonal linear discriminant analysis (DLDA) classification algorithm to predict MV responders and nonresponders, which was validated in additional randomly selected GBM and ovarian cancer PDX and 10 GBM patients treated with MV in a phase I trial. GBM PDX lines were also treated with the US Food and Drug Administration-approved JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib, for 48 hours prior to MV infection and virus production, STAT1/3 signaling and interferon stimulated gene expression was assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Constitutive interferon pathway activation, as reflected in the DLDA algorithm, was identified as the key determinant for MV replication, independent of virus receptor expression, in MV-permissive and -resistant GBM PDXs. Using these lines as the training data for the DLDA algorithm, we confirmed the accuracy of our algorithm in predicting MV response in randomly selected GBM PDX ovarian cancer PDXs. Using the DLDA prediction algorithm, we demonstrate that virus replication in patient tumors is inversely correlated with expression of this resistance gene signature (ρ = -0.717, P = .03). In vitro inhibition of the interferon response pathway with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib was able to overcome resistance and increase virus production (1000-fold, P = .03) in GBM PDX lines. Conclusions: These findings document a key mechanism of tumor resistance to oncolytic MV therapy and describe for the first time the development of a prediction algorithm to preselect for oncolytic treatment or combinatorial strategies.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapySignal TransductionAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGenetic VectorsHumansInterferonsMeasles virusMiceNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesReproducibility of ResultsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysInterferons

Identifiers

PMID29788332
PMCPMC6186520
OpenAlexW2803978276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.