Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788321›Full record

SynthesisDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2018

Presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and rehabilitative intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

A Kaneoka, S Yang, H Inokuchi, R Ueha, H Yamashita, T Nito, Y Seto, N Haga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A KaneokaRehabilitation Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital.
S YangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
H InokuchiRehabilitation Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital.
R UehaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.
H YamashitaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
T NitoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.
Y SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
N HagaRehabilitation Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital.
University of Tokyo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No study has systematically reviewed the evidence on presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and swallowing rehabilitation following esophagectomy. The purposes of this systematic review are to 1) qualitatively synthesize the current findings on oropharyngeal swallowing abnormalities identified by instrumental swallowing evaluations, 2) describe the reported health-related outcomes in relation to swallowing abnormality following esophagectomy, and 3) examine the efficacy of reported rehabilitative interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients who underwent esophagectomy. Publications were searched using five electronic databases. No language or publication date restrictions were imposed. Two authors performed a blind review for published or unpublished studies that reported swallowing biomechanics and dysphagic symptoms using instrumental evaluation of swallowing, specifically the videofluoroscopic swallowing study and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, and/or health-related outcomes in relation to swallowing abnormalities, and/or therapeutic interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia following esophagectomy. Twelve studies out of 2,193 studies including 458 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported abnormal swallowing biomechanics included vocal fold immobility, delayed onset of swallowing, reduced hyolaryngeal elevation, and reduced opening of the upper esophageal sphincter. Aspiration (0-81%) and pharyngeal residue (22-100%) were prevalent. Those abnormal swallowing biomechanics and swallowing symptoms were commonly reported following both transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Pneumonia presented in 5-25% of the study patients. One quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of swallowing exercises for postoperative oropharyngeal dysphagia; three case series reported a benefit of the chin-tuck maneuver in reducing aspiration and residue. This review revealed distinct swallowing impairments and increased pneumonia risks following esophagectomy. This review also found that evidence on the efficacy of therapeutic interventions was limited. Future studies are warranted to develop effective rehabilitative interventions for postesophagectomy patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29788321
PMCPMC6127108
OpenAlexW2804082814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.