Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788308›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

PheProb: probabilistic phenotyping using diagnosis codes to improve power for genetic association studies.

Jennifer A Sinnott, Fiona Cai, Sheng Yu, Boris P Hejblum, Chuan Hong, Isaac S Kohane, Katherine P Liao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomedical literature-based clinical phenotype definition discovery using large language models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  2. A general framework for developing computable clinical phenotype algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Machine learning approaches for electronic health records phenotyping: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Automated ICD coding via unsupervised knowledge integration (UNITE).International journal of medical informatics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Empirical Findings on the Role of Structured Data, Unstructured Data, and their Combination for Automatic Clinical Phenotyping.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer A SinnottDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Fiona CaiStuyvesant High School, New York City, NY, USA.
Sheng YuCenter for Statistical Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Boris P HejblumUniv. Bordeaux, ISPED, Inserm BPH 1219, Inria SISTM, Bordeaux, France.
Chuan HongDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Isaac S KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine P LiaoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USBordeaux Population Health · FRBrigham and Women's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Daniel Hal Solomon · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Statistical Methods for Optimizing Personalized Treatment SelectionR01HL089778 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LU TIAN · 2008 to 2026
$4.8M
Lipids, Inflammation, and Cardiovascular Risk in Rheumatoid ArthritisR01HL127118 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIAO, KATHERINE PHOENIX · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
Genetic predictors of anti-TNF treatment response and infections in IBDK23DK097142 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANANTHAKRISHNAN, ASHWIN N · 2012 to 2016
$846k
Semi-supervised learning with electronic medical recordsF31GM119263 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GRONSBELL, JESSICA · 2016 to 2016
$34k
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089778NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127118NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK097142NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM119263NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Standard approaches for large scale phenotypic screens using electronic health record (EHR) data apply thresholds, such as ≥2 diagnosis codes, to define subjects as having a phenotype. However, the variation in the accuracy of diagnosis codes can impair the power of such screens. Our objective was to develop and evaluate an approach which converts diagnosis codes into a probability of a phenotype (PheProb). We hypothesized that this alternate approach for defining phenotypes would improve power for genetic association studies. Methods: The PheProb approach employs unsupervised clustering to separate patients into 2 groups based on diagnosis codes. Subjects are assigned a probability of having the phenotype based on the number of diagnosis codes. This approach was developed using simulated EHR data and tested in a real world EHR cohort. In the latter, we tested the association between low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) genetic risk alleles known for association with hyperlipidemia and hyperlipidemia codes (ICD-9 272.x). PheProb and thresholding approaches were compared. Results: Among n = 1462 subjects in the real world EHR cohort, the threshold-based p-values for association between the genetic risk score (GRS) and hyperlipidemia were 0.126 (≥1 code), 0.123 (≥2 codes), and 0.142 (≥3 codes). The PheProb approach produced the expected significant association between the GRS and hyperlipidemia: p = .001. Conclusions: PheProb improves statistical power for association studies relative to standard thresholding approaches by leveraging information about the phenotype in the billing code counts. The PheProb approach has direct applications where efficient approaches are required, such as in Phenome-Wide Association Studies.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesInternational Classification of DiseasesPhenotypeArthritis, RheumatoidCholesterol, LDLCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsGenetic TestingHumansHyperlipidemiasPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilityRiskCholesterol, LDL

Identifiers

PMID29788308
PMCPMC6915826
OpenAlexW2804842126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.