ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2018
Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.
Article in American journal of hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03480217 (Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase the Uptake of the USPSTF Hypertension Screening Recommendations in an Ambulatory Care Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase the Uptake of the USPSTF Hypertension Screening Recommendations in an Ambulatory Care Network: a Cluster Randomized Trial
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility of Implementing a Clinical Integration Package to Support Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Trial
- Adopting Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Underserved Communities (ASPIRE): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Trial
- A Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: The EMBRACE Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Accuracy of abbreviated protocols for unattended automated office blood pressure measurements, a retrospective study.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Integrating Scalability and Equity into Hypertension Remote Patient Monitoring Program Design.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Disparities in Blood Pressure Measurement.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Pharmacist-Led Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Community Pharmacy: An Operational Feasibility Case Series.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of Health Literacy on use of a Virtual Coach to Promote Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Identifying barriers to the acceptability and adoption of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and proposed strategies in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements in Waiting Room or Isolated Room for Diagnosis and Phenotyping of Hypertension.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Perspectives of Ghanaian pregnant women on family involvement in home blood pressure Monitoring: A qualitative analysis.Pregnancy hypertension · 2025Article
- English- and Spanish-Speaking Patient Preferences on Home Blood Pressure Monitors in an Urban Safety Net Setting: Qualitative Study.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Factors impacting electronic patient-generated data use in safety-net systems: a qualitative study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Federally qualified health center patients' experiences with remote patient monitoring as part of telehealth services for self-measured blood pressure monitoring.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Reliability of remote at-home oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in community-dwelling children aged 3-17.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of collecting biobehavioral data from Latinx transgender and nonbinary people.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
- Screening and Management of Pediatric High Blood Pressure-Challenges to Implementing the Clinical Practice Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2024Review
- Facilitators and barriers to home blood pressure monitoring among pregnant women in Ghana: a mixed-methods analysis of patient perspectives.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Psychological Distress and Hypertension Diagnostic Testing: Is There Anything to Worry About?American journal of hypertension · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines recommend that patients with newly elevated office blood pressure undergo ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) to rule-out white coat hypertension before being diagnosed with hypertension. We explored patients' perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to undergoing ABPM or HBPM.
methodsFocus groups were conducted with twenty English- and Spanish-speaking individuals from underserved communities in New York City. Two researchers analyzed transcripts using a conventional content analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in ABPM and HBPM.
resultsParticipants described favorable attitudes toward testing including readily understanding white coat hypertension, agreeing with the rationale for out-of-office testing, and believing that testing would benefit patients. Regarding ABPM, participants expressed concerns over the representativeness of the day the test was performed and the intrusiveness of the frequent readings. Regarding HBPM, participants expressed concerns over the validity of the monitoring method and the reliability of home blood pressure devices. For both tests, participants noted that out-of-pocket costs may deter patient participation and felt that patients would require detailed information about the test itself before deciding to participate. Participants overwhelmingly believed that out-of-office testing benefits outweighed testing barriers, were confident that they could successfully complete either testing if recommended by their provider, and described the rationale for their testing preference.
conclusionsParticipants identified dominant barriers and facilitators to ABPM and HBPM testing, articulated testing preferences, and believed that they could successfully complete out-of-office testing if recommended by their provider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.