Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29788130›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2018

Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Qualitative Study.

Eileen J Carter, Nathalie Moise, Carmela Alcántara, Alexandra M Sullivan, Ian M Kronish

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03480217 (Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase the Uptake of the USPSTF Hypertension Screening Recommendations in an Ambulatory Care Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03480217 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing the Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase the Uptake of the USPSTF Hypertension Screening Recommendations in an Ambulatory Care Network: a Cluster Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2018 to 2022Enrolled1,186ConditionsHypertension,Essential, White Coat HypertensionArmsMultifaceted Implementation Strategy, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Disparities in Blood Pressure Measurement.Current hypertension reports · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors impacting electronic patient-generated data use in safety-net systems: a qualitative study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eileen J CarterColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Nathalie MoiseCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Carmela AlcántaraColumbia University School of Social Work, New York, New York, USA.
Alexandra M SullivanCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ian M KronishCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Increasing the Uptake of the USPSTF Hypertension Screening Guidelines in Primary Care.R01HS024262 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRONISH, IAN MATTHEW · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
Identifying Novel Behavioral Targets for Improving Sleep: A Self-Regulation ModelK23HL125748 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ALCANTARA, CARMELA · 2015 to 2019
$924k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024262NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL125748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend that patients with newly elevated office blood pressure undergo ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) to rule-out white coat hypertension before being diagnosed with hypertension. We explored patients' perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to undergoing ABPM or HBPM.

methodsFocus groups were conducted with twenty English- and Spanish-speaking individuals from underserved communities in New York City. Two researchers analyzed transcripts using a conventional content analysis to identify barriers and facilitators to participation in ABPM and HBPM.

resultsParticipants described favorable attitudes toward testing including readily understanding white coat hypertension, agreeing with the rationale for out-of-office testing, and believing that testing would benefit patients. Regarding ABPM, participants expressed concerns over the representativeness of the day the test was performed and the intrusiveness of the frequent readings. Regarding HBPM, participants expressed concerns over the validity of the monitoring method and the reliability of home blood pressure devices. For both tests, participants noted that out-of-pocket costs may deter patient participation and felt that patients would require detailed information about the test itself before deciding to participate. Participants overwhelmingly believed that out-of-office testing benefits outweighed testing barriers, were confident that they could successfully complete either testing if recommended by their provider, and described the rationale for their testing preference.

conclusionsParticipants identified dominant barriers and facilitators to ABPM and HBPM testing, articulated testing preferences, and believed that they could successfully complete out-of-office testing if recommended by their provider.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPatient PreferencePredictive Value of TestsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID29788130
PMCPMC7190918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.