Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29787966›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Injection drug use, HIV/HCV, and related services in nonurban areas of the United States: A systematic review.

Catherine E Paquette, Robin A Pollini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine E PaquettePacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11720 Beltsville Drive, Beltsville, MD, 20705, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
Robin A PolliniPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11720 Beltsville Drive, Beltsville, MD, 20705, United States; Injury Control Research Center and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University, 3606 Collins Ferry Road, Suite 201, Morgantown, WV, 26505, United States. Electronic address: robin.pollini@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
West Virginia University Injury Control Research CenterR49CE002109 · CE · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BOSSARTE, ROBERT M · 2012 to 2018
$5.7M
OTC Syringe Sales to Prevent HIV in Underserved Areas of Inland CaliforniaR01DA035098 · NIDA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI POLLINI, ROBIN A · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
ACL HHS R49CE002109NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002109NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035098NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjection drug use (IDU) in nonurban areas of the United States is a growing public health concern, but there has been no comprehensive assessment of existing research on injection-related HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) in nonurban communities. We conducted a systematic review to assess the current literature and identify knowledge gaps.

methodsWe systematically searched six databases for relevant articles published between January 1990 and June 2016 and screened, extracted, and analyzed the resulting data. Studies were included if they reported original findings from the nonurban U.S. related to 1) IDU and its role in HIV/HCV transmission, and/or 2) HIV/HCV services for people who inject drugs (PWID).

resultsOf 2330 studies, 34 from 24 unique research projects in 17 states met inclusion criteria. Despite increasing HCV and high vulnerability to injection-related HIV outbreaks in nonurban areas, only three studies since 2010 recruited and tested PWID for HIV/HCV. Twelve reported on sharing injection equipment but used varying definitions of sharing, and only eight examined correlates of injection risk. Nine studies on syringe access suggest limited access through syringe exchange programs and pharmacies. Only two studies addressed HCV testing, none addressed HIV testing, and three examined behavioral or other interventions.

conclusionsDespite growing concern regarding nonurban IDU there are few studies of HIV/HCV and related services for PWID, and the existing literature covers a very limited geographical area. Current research provides minimal insights into any unique factors that influence injection risk and HIV/HCV service provision and utilization among nonurban PWID.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesRural PopulationSuburban PopulationDatabases, FactualHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansNeedle-Exchange ProgramsRisk-TakingSubstance Abuse, IntravenousUnited StatesHCVHIVIDUNonurbanPWIDRural

Identifiers

PMID29787966
PMCPMC5999584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.