Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29787953›Full record

Trial reportAsian journal of psychiatry2018

Public perceptions toward mental illness in Japan.

Mami Kasahara-Kiritani, Tomoko Matoba, Saeko Kikuzawa, Junko Sakano, Katsumi Sugiyama, Chikako Yamaki, Mieko Mochizuki, Yoshihiko Yamazaki

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Asian journal of psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Pathophysiology, prognosis and treatment of tardive dyskinesia.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mami Kasahara-KiritaniDepartment of Ethics Support, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Family Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: mamikiri@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Tomoko MatobaDepartment of Human Care and Support, Faculty of Human Life Design, Toyo University, Saitama, Japan.
Saeko KikuzawaDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko SakanoDepartment of Welfare System and Health Science, Okayama Prefectural University, Okayama, Japan.
Katsumi SugiyamaDepartment of Social Welfare, Aomori University of Health and Welfare, Aomori, Japan.
Chikako YamakiCenter for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Mieko MochizukiAccelight, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiko YamazakiDepartment of Social Welfare, Nihon Fukushi University, Aichi, Japan.
Aomori University of Health and Welfare · JPHosei University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPNihon Fukushi University · JPOkayama Prefectural University · JPToyo University · JP

Funding

Stigma and Mental Illness in Cross-National PerspectiveR01TW006374 · FIC · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PESCOSOLIDO, BERNICE A. · 2003 to 2007
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW006374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose was to characterize public perceptions in Japan of mental illness and how they related to stigma-related attitudes for the same.

methodsData were obtained using a vignette survey conducted as a part of the Stigma in Global Context - Mental Health Study and contained a nationally representative sample (n = 994). The survey was conducted using a multi-mode approach (face-to-face interviews, the drop-off-and-pick-up, postal collection) from September to December 2006, with a multi-stage probability sample of Japanese residents aged 18-64 years. Respondents were randomly assigned one of four vignette conditions that described psychiatric disorders meeting the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (one vignette for each gender exhibiting each diagnosis). We compared respondents' stigma-related attitudes and perceptions toward mental illness between vignettes.

resultsOver 80% of Japanese participants believed that depressive disorder or schizophrenia could be cured via treatment. However, Japanese people still had relatively strong vigilance and denial of competency toward schizophrenia.

conclusionsParticipants expressed the belief that mental illnesses are curable, but stigma toward people with schizophrenia was still relatively strong.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMental DisordersSocial StigmaStereotypingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJapanMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedYoung AdultDepressive disorderJapanMental healthSchizophreniaStigmaStigma-related attitudes

Identifiers

PMID29787953
PMCPMC6019626
OpenAlexW2804609633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.