Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29787614›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Outcome of polycystic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Vincent Dupont, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Mickaël Sigogne, Clémence Bechade, Thierry Lobbedez, Jose Portoles, Philippe Rieu, Moustapha Drame, Fatouma Touré

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The transition clinic in chronic kidney disease care.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent DupontDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Lukshe KanagaratnamDepartment of Research and Innovation, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Mickaël SigogneDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Clémence BechadeDivision of Nephrology, University hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
Thierry LobbedezDivision of Nephrology, University hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
Jose PortolesDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital of Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Philippe RieuDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Moustapha DrameDepartment of Research and Innovation, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Fatouma TouréDivision of Nephrology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FRHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycystic kidney disease (PKD) is the most frequent hereditary cause of chronic kidney disease. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often avoided for patients with PKD because of the suspected risk of mechanical and infectious complications. Only a few studies have analyzed the outcome of PKD patients on PD with sometimes conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate outcomes of patients with PKD treated by PD.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed examining all studies which included "Polycystic kidney disease" and "Peritoneal dialysis" in their titles, excluding commentaries, letters to the authors and abstracts. PubMed, Embase, Google scholar and Scopus were searched to December 31st 2017. The primary outcome was overall patient survival. Additional outcomes were PD technique survival, incidence of peritonitis and incidence of abdominal wall hernia.

results9 studies published between 1998 and 2016 were included for analysis with a total of 7,197 patients including 882 PKD patients. Overall survival of PKD patients was found to be better compared to non-PKD patients (HR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.92]). There were no statistical differences between PKD and non-PKD patients in terms of peritonitis (OR = 0.86 [95% CI, 0.66-1.12]) and technical survival (HR = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83-1.16]). There was an increased risk of hernia in PKD patients (OR = 2.28 [95% CI, 1.26-4.12]).

conclusionsPKD is associated with a better global survival, an increased risk of abdominal hernia, but no differences in peritonitis rate or technical survival were found. PD is a safe dialysis modality for PKD patients. Properly designed controlled studies are needed to determine whether all PKD patients are eligible for PD or whether some specific criteria should be determined.

Indexed as

HumansKidney Failure, ChronicPeritoneal DialysisPolycystic Kidney Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29787614
PMCPMC5963788
OpenAlexW2804375885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.