Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29787440›Full record

ArticleHealth physics2018

Developments in Biodosimetry Methods for Triage With a Focus on X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance In Vivo Fingernail Dosimetry.

Steven G Swarts, Jason W Sidabras, Oleg Grinberg, Dmitriy S Tipikin, Maciej M Kmiec, Sergey V Petryakov, Wilson Schreiber, Victoria A Wood, Benjamin B Williams, Ann Barry Flood and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Development of high-throughput systems for biodosimetry.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven G SwartsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100385, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA.
Jason W SidabrasMax Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Biophysical Chemistry, Stiftstr. 34-36, 45470 Mülheim, Germany.
Oleg GrinbergGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Dmitriy S TipikinGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Maciej M KmiecGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Sergey V PetryakovGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Wilson SchreiberGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Victoria A WoodGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Benjamin B WilliamsGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Ann Barry FloodGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Harold M SwartzGeisel School of Medicine, HB 7785 Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion · DEUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Scientific and Administrative Core: Dartmouth Medical SchoolU19AI091173 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SWARTS, STEVEN GREGORY · 2010 to 2014
$16.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI091173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumentation and application methodologies for rapidly and accurately estimating individual ionizing radiation dose are needed for on-site triage in a radiological/nuclear event. One such methodology is an in vivo X-band, electron paramagnetic resonance, physically based dosimetry method to directly measure the radiation-induced signal in fingernails. The primary components under development are key instrument features, such as resonators with unique geometries that allow for large sampling volumes but limit radiation-induced signal measurements to the nail plate, and methodological approaches for addressing interfering signals in the nail and for calibrating dose from radiation-induced signal measurements. One resonator development highlighted here is a surface resonator array designed to reduce signal detection losses due to the soft tissues underlying the nail plate. Several surface resonator array geometries, along with ergonomic features to stabilize fingernail placement, have been tested in tissue-equivalent nail models and in vivo nail measurements of healthy volunteers using simulated radiation-induced signals in their fingernails. These studies demonstrated radiation-induced signal detection sensitivities and quantitation limits approaching the clinically relevant range of ≤ 10 Gy. Studies of the capabilities of the current instrument suggest that a reduction in the variability in radiation-induced signal measurements can be obtained with refinements to the surface resonator array and ergonomic features of the human interface to the instrument. Additional studies are required before the quantitative limits of the assay can be determined for triage decisions in a field application of dosimetry. These include expanded in vivo nail studies and associated ex vivo nail studies to provide informed approaches to accommodate for a potential interfering native signal in the nails when calculating the radiation-induced signal from the nail plate spectral measurements and to provide a method for calibrating dose estimates from the radiation-induced signal measurements based on quantifying experiments in patients undergoing total-body irradiation or total-skin electron therapy.

Indexed as

Biological AssayElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNailsRadiation DosageRadiometryTriage

Identifiers

PMID29787440
PMCPMC5967651
OpenAlexW2803422174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.