Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29786556›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Assessment of stem cell differentiation based on genome-wide expression profiles.

Patricio Godoy, Wolfgang Schmidt-Heck, Birte Hellwig, Patrick Nell, David Feuerborn, Jörg Rahnenführer, Kathrin Kattler, Jörn Walter, Nils Blüthgen, Jan G Hengstler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reporter Alleles in hiPSCs: Visual Cues on Development and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Monitoring Cultured Rat Hepatocytes Using RNA-Seq In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Designer human tissue: coming to a lab near you.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patricio GodoyIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany godoy@ifado.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7882-5369
Wolfgang Schmidt-HeckLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology eV-Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.
Birte HellwigDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Patrick NellIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
David FeuerbornIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Jörg RahnenführerDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Kathrin KattlerDepartment of Genetics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany.
Jörn WalterInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Nils BlüthgenInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0171-7447
Jan G HengstlerIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, protocols have been established to differentiate stem and precursor cells into more mature cell types. However, progress in this field has been hampered by difficulties to assess the differentiation status of stem cell-derived cells in an unbiased manner. Here, we present an analysis pipeline based on published data and methods to quantify the degree of differentiation and to identify transcriptional control factors explaining differences from the intended target cells or tissues. The pipeline requires RNA-Seq or gene array data of the stem cell starting population, derived 'mature' cells and primary target cells or tissue. It consists of a principal component analysis to represent global expression changes and to identify possible problems of the dataset that require special attention, such as: batch effects; clustering techniques to identify gene groups with similar features; over-representation analysis to characterize biological motifs and transcriptional control factors of the identified gene clusters; and metagenes as well as gene regulatory networks for quantitative cell-type assessment and identification of influential transcription factors. Possibilities and limitations of the analysis pipeline are illustrated using the example of human embryonic stem cell and human induced pluripotent cells to generate 'hepatocyte-like cells'. The pipeline quantifies the degree of incomplete differentiation as well as remaining stemness and identifies unwanted features, such as colon- and fibroblast-associated gene clusters that are absent in real hepatocytes but typically induced by currently available differentiation protocols. Finally, transcription factors responsible for incomplete and unwanted differentiation are identified. The proposed method is widely applicable and allows an unbiased and quantitative assessment of stem cell-derived cells.This article is part of the theme issue 'Designer human tissue: coming to a lab near you'.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCell DifferentiationGenome, HumanHumansPluripotent Stem Cellshepatocytesstem cellstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID29786556
PMCPMC5974444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.