ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2018
Randomized clinical trials and personalized medicine: A commentary on deaton and cartwright.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Are we properly evaluating genetic and genomic testing? A systematic review of health technology assessment reports.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Targeted agents in patients with progressive glioblastoma-A systematic meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Individual-centric N-of-1 trials: a case study assessing the effect of alcohol abstinence on mood levels.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Value-based health care frameworks for the health technology assessments of "omics" technologies: an international survey.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Precision Epidemiology: A Computational Analysis of the Impact of Algorithmic Prediction on the Relationship Between Population Epidemiology and Clinical Epidemiology.International journal of public health · 2024Article
- Exploring human biology with N-of-1 clinical trials.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Article
- Can we Reconcile Evidence-based Medicine with Personalized Medicine: Poised on a Cusp!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
- A pre-symptomatic incubation model for precision strategies of screening, quarantine, and isolation based on imported COVID-19 cases in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Does Modulation of an Epigenetic Clock Define a Geroprotector?Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2022Article
- Accommodating Serial Correlation and Sequential Design Elements in Personalized Studies and Aggregated Personalized Studies.Harvard data science review · 2022Article
- Strategies for Testing Intervention Matching Schemes in Cancer.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Review
- Personalized Medicine, Disruptive Innovation, and "Trailblazer" Guidelines: Case Study and Theorization of an Unsuccessful Change Effort.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: A Pilot Study on Deep Learning for Hypoglycemic Events Detection based on ECG.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Power and Design Issues in Crossover-Based N-Of-1 Clinical Trials with Fixed Data Collection Periods.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- What is Evidence-Based Functional Medicine in the 21st Century?Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine.Cancer treatment and research · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.