Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29786067›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Disrupting reconsolidation: memory erasure or blunting of emotional/motivational value?

Elizabeth S Cogan, Mark A Shapses, Terry E Robinson, Natalie C Tronson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth S CoganBiopsychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Mark A ShapsesBiopsychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Terry E RobinsonBiopsychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-3737
Natalie C TronsonBiopsychology Program, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ntronson@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-1579
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When memories are retrieved they become labile, and subject to alteration by a process known as reconsolidation. Disruption of memory reconsolidation decreases the performance of learned responses, which is often attributed to erasure of the memory; in the case of Pavlovian learning, to a loss of the association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US). However, an alternative interpretation is that disrupting reconsolidation does not erase memories, but blunts their emotional/motivational impact. It is difficult to parse the predictive vs. emotional/motivational value of CSs in non-human animals, but studies on variation in the form of conditioned responses (CRs) in a Pavlovian conditioned approach task suggest a way to do this. In this task a lever-CS paired with a food reward (US) acquires predictive value in all rats, but is attributed with emotional/motivational value to a greater extent in some rats (sign-trackers) than others (goal-trackers). We report that the post-retrieval administration of propranolol selectively attenuates a sign-tracking CR, and the associated neural activation of brain "motive circuits", while having no effect on conditioned orienting behavior in sign-trackers, or on goal-tracking CRs evoked by either a lever-CS or a tone-CS. We conclude that the disruption of reconsolidation by post-retrieval propranolol degrades the emotional/motivational impact of the CS, required for sign-tracking, but leaves the CS-US association intact. The possibility that post-retrieval interventions can reduce the emotional/motivational aspects of memories, without actually erasing them, has important implications for treating maladaptive memories that contribute to some psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesEmotionsMaleMemory ConsolidationMotivationNadololPropranololRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsNadololPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID29786067
PMCPMC6300536
OpenAlexW2802670763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.