Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785679›Full record

Observational studyDysphagia2018

Drooling in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence of a Role for Divided Attention.

Hannah Reynolds, Nick Miller, Richard Walker

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Dysphagia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dysphagia in Parkinson Disease: Part I - Pathophysiology and Diagnostic Practices.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Movement Disorders and the Gut: A Review.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Clinical features associated with drooling in Parkinson's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Excessive buccal saliva in patients with Parkinson's disease of the French COPARK cohort.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah ReynoldsSouth Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, UK. hannah.reynolds5@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-2842
Nick MillerNewcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Speech and Language Sciences, George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Richard WalkerNorthumbria Health NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside District Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE29 8NH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drooling is a frequently reported symptom in Parkinson's Disease (PD) with significant psychosocial impact and negative health consequences including silent aspiration of saliva with the associated risk of respiratory infections. It is suggested that in PD drooling is associated with inefficient oropharyngeal swallowing which reduces the effective clearance of saliva rather than hyper-salivation. This is compounded by unintended mouth opening and flexed posture increasing anterior loss of saliva. It is reported to occur most frequently during cognitively distracting concurrent tasks suggesting an impact from divided attention in a dual-task situation. However, this supposition has not been systematically examined. This study assessed whether frequency of saliva swallows reduced, and drooling severity and frequency increased, when people with PD engaged in a cognitively distracting task. 18 patients with idiopathic PD reporting daytime drooling on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were recruited. They completed the Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for PD saliva questionnaire and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. UPDRS drooling score, disease stage, duration, gender, and age were recorded. Swallow frequency and drooling severity and frequency were measured at rest and during a distracting computer-based language task. There was no significant difference between drooling severity at rest and during distraction (Wilcoxon signed rank test z = - 1.724, p = 0.085). There was a significant difference between at rest and distraction conditions for both drooling frequency (Wilcoxon signed rank test z = - 2.041, p = 0.041) and swallow frequency (Wilcoxon signed rank test z = - 3.054, p = 0.002). Participants swallowed less frequently and drooled more often during the distraction task. The frequency of saliva swallows and drooling are affected by divided attention in a dual-task paradigm. Further studies are needed to explore the exact role of attention in saliva management and the clinical applications in assessment and treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAttentionCross-Sectional StudiesDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleParkinson DiseaseSalivaSeverity of Illness IndexSialorrheaStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and AnalysisDivided attentionDroolingDual taskDysphagiaParkinson’s

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.