Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785655›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2020

Early results after operatively versus non-operatively treated flail chest: a retrospective study focusing on outcome and complications.

Mathieu M E Wijffels, Tjebbe Hagenaars, Diba Latifi, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Michael H J Verhofstad

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns among patients included in rib fracture studies; A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of flail chest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Rib Plating Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Flail Chest: Comparison of Adverse Events in More than 12,500 Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regional anaesthesia techniques for management of severe chest wall trauma: a major trauma centre retrospective observational study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Observational
  10. Post-discharge complications and follow-up timing after hospitalization for traumatic rib fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Surgical stabilization of serial rib fractures is advantageous in patients with relevant traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathieu M E WijffelsTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.wijffels@erasmusmc.nl.
Tjebbe HagenaarsTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diba LatifiTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esther M M Van LieshoutTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael H J VerhofstadTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFlail chest was traditionally treated non-operatively using mechanical ventilation and pain control. In order to reduce the occurrence of ventilation-associated complications and long-term disability, operative rib fixation is becoming a proven standard therapy for these patients. However, the consequences of the surgical complications may influence success rates negatively. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of flail chest treatment by surgical rib fixation with non-operative treatment, with special focus on the impact of surgical complications.

methodsA retrospective case series of operatively treated flail chest patients was compared with non-operatively treated patients. Patients' injury and treatment characteristics and outcome parameters (e.g., duration of mechanical ventilation, length of Intensive Care stay (ICLOS) and hospital length of stay (HLOS), mortality, surgery-related complications and pneumonia) were collected from the patients' medical files. Crude and matched-pairs analyses were performed in SPSS.

resultsTwenty-three operatively and 47 non-operatively treated patients were enrolled. Operatively treated patients required significantly shorter mechanical ventilation; median 4 days versus 12 days for the non-operative group (p = 0.011). The matched-pairs analysis also showed a lower pneumonia rate (35% versus 80%; p = 0.035) and a shorter HLOS (median 21 versus 23 days; p = 0.028) in the operative group. No significant differences in duration of ICLOS, and occurrence of other injury-related adverse events were found between both groups. 
Seven surgery-related complications occurred, of which three required invasive solutions.

conclusionsOperative fixation of a flail chest in trauma patients results in a lower rate of pneumonia, less mechanical ventilation days and shorter hospital stay, compared with non-operative treatment, but at the cost of surgery-related complications requiring invasive solutions in some cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleFlail ChestHumansLength of StayMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedPneumoniaPostoperative ComplicationsRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersComplicationsFlail chestOperativeOutcomePneumoniaRib fracture

Identifiers

PMID29785655
PMCPMC7280328
OpenAlexW2804383545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.