Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785654›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination.

B L S Borger van der Burg, Thijs T C F van Dongen, J J Morrison, P P A Hedeman Joosten, J J DuBose, T M Hörer, R Hoencamp

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The role of REBOA in patients in traumatic cardiac arrest subsequent to hemorrhagic shock: a scoping review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

B L S Borger van der BurgDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Thijs T C F van DongenDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands. ttcfvandongen@alrijne.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-5545
J J MorrisonR. Adam Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, USA.
P P A Hedeman JoostenDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
J J DuBoseDivision of Vascular Surgery, David Grant Medical Center, Travis AFB, California, USA.
T M HörerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
R HoencampDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Alrijne Ziekenhuis · NLGrant Medical Center · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLMinistry of Defence · GBÖrebro University Hospital · SEUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculatory collapse is a leading cause of mortality among traumatic major exsanguination and in ruptured aortic aneurysm patients. Approximately 40% of patients die before hemorrhage control is achieved. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an adjunct designed to sustain the circulation until definitive surgical or endovascular repair. A systematic review was conducted for the current clinical use of REBOA in patients with hemodynamic instability and to discuss its potential role in improving prehospital and in-hospital outcome.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis (1900-2017) using MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science and Central and Emcare using the keywords "aortic balloon occlusion", "aortic balloon tamponade", "REBOA", and "Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion" in combination with hemorrhage control, hemorrhage, resuscitation, shock, ruptured abdominal or thoracic aorta, endovascular repair, and open repair. Original published studies on human subjects were considered.

resultsA total of 490 studies were identified; 89 met criteria for inclusion. Of the 1436 patients, overall reported mortality was 49.2% (613/1246) with significant differences (p < 0.001) between clinical indications. Hemodynamic shock was evident in 79.3%, values between clinical indications showed significant difference (p < 0.001). REBOA was favored as treatment in trauma patients in terms of mortality. Pooled analysis demonstrated an increase in mean systolic pressure by almost 50 mmHg following REBOA use.

conclusionREBOA has been used in trauma patients and ruptured aortic aneurysm patients with improvement of hemodynamic parameters and outcomes for several decades. Formal, prospective study is warranted to clarify the role of this adjunct in all hemodynamic unstable patients.

Indexed as

AortaBalloon OcclusionExsanguinationHemodynamicsHumansResuscitationShock, HemorrhagicAortic balloon occlusionEndovascularREBOAShockTrauma

Identifiers

PMID29785654
PMCPMC6096615
OpenAlexW2804296463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.