Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29785613›Full record

ReviewInfection2018

Neuroinfections caused by fungi.

Katarzyna Góralska, Joanna Blaszkowska, Magdalena Dzikowiec

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 281 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Case report of a brain abscess due toMedical mycology case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. An in-depth review on antimicrobial efficacy of melittin in vivo.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fungal meningoencephalitis caused byMedical mycology case reports · 2026
    Article
  11. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Post-endoscopic neurosurgicalFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Case Report: A pediatric case of multifocalFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  14. Construction and verification of early diagnosis model of tuberculous meningitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. A comprehensive review of neurotropic fungal infections: clinical manifestations and vaccines.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Characteristics and Distribution of Fungal Meningitis: A Systematic Review.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna GóralskaDepartment of Biomedicine and Genetics, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, 92-213, Lodz, Poland. katarzyna.goralska@umed.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-8879
Joanna BlaszkowskaDepartment of Diagnostics and Treatment of Parasitic Diseases and Mycoses, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, 92-213, Lodz, Poland.
Magdalena DzikowiecDepartment of Diagnostics and Treatment of Parasitic Diseases and Mycoses, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, 92-213, Lodz, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal infections of the central nervous system (FIs-CNS) have become significantly more common over the past 2 decades. Invasion of the CNS largely depends on the immune status of the host and the virulence of the fungal strain. Infections with fungi cause a significant morbidity in immunocompromised hosts, and the involvement of the CNS may lead to fatal consequences.

methodsOne hundred and thirty-five articles on fungal neuroinfection in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were selected for review using the following search words: "fungi and CNS mycoses", CNS fungal infections", "fungal brain infections", " fungal cerebritis", fungal meningitis", "diagnostics of fungal infections", and "treatment of CNS fungal infections". All were published in English with the majority in the period 2000-2018. This review focuses on the current knowledge of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment of selected FIs-CNS.

resultsThe FIs-CNS can have various clinical presentations, mainly meningitis, encephalitis, hydrocephalus, cerebral abscesses, and stroke syndromes. The etiologic factors of neuroinfections are yeasts (Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida spp., Trichosporon spp.), moniliaceous moulds (Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp.), Mucoromycetes (Mucor spp., Rhizopus spp.), dimorphic fungi (Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides spp., Histoplasma capsulatum), and dematiaceous fungi (Cladophialophora bantiana, Exophiala dermatitidis). Their common route of transmission is inhalation or inoculation from trauma or surgery, with subsequent hematogenous or contiguous spread. As the manifestations of FIs-CNS are often non-specific, their diagnosis is very difficult. A fast identification of the etiological factor of neuroinfection and the application of appropriate therapy are crucial in preventing an often fatal outcome. The choice of effective drug depends on its extent of CNS penetration and spectrum of activity. Pharmaceutical formulations of amphotericin B (AmB) (among others, deoxycholate-AmBd and liposomal L-AmB) have relatively limited distribution in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); however, their detectable therapeutic concentrations in the CNS makes them recommended drugs for the treatment of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis (AmBd with flucytosine) and CNS candidiasis (L-AmB) and mucormycosis (L-AmB). Voriconazole, a moderately lipophilic molecule with good CNS penetration, is recommended in the first-line therapy of CNS aspergillosis. Other triazoles, such as posaconazole and itraconazole, with negligible concentrations in the CSF are not considered effective drugs for therapy of CNS fungal neuroinfections. In contrast, clinical data have shown that a novel triazole, isavuconazole, achieved considerable efficacy for the treatment of some fungal neuroinfections. Echinocandins with relatively low or undetectable concentrations in the CSF do not play meaningful role in the treatment of FIs-CNS.

conclusionAlthough the number of fungal species causing CNS mycosis is increasing, only some possess well-defined treatment standards (e.g., cryptococcal meningitis and CNS aspergillosis). The early diagnosis of fungal infection, accompanied by identification of the etiological factor, is needed to allow the selection of effective therapy in patients with FIs-CNS and limit their high mortality.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System Fungal InfectionsDisease ManagementFungiHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansRisk FactorsVirulenceFungal CNS infectionsFungal meningitisFungiNeuroinfectionRisk groupsSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID29785613
PMCPMC6096918
OpenAlexW2804249835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.