ReviewWorld journal of urology2019
Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer?
Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Decrease in tumor content assessed in biopsies is associated with improved treatment outcome response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020Trial
- Evaluation of AI for prostate cancer detection in biparametric-MRI screening population data.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Fusion-Guided and Randomized Biopsies in Prostate Cancer: Evidence for an Integrated Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating biomarkers and multi-parametric MRI to provide enhanced clinical diagnosis for prostate cancer.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- Case report: PSMA PET/CT addresses the correct diagnosis in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer despite negative core biopsies and mpMRI. A diagnostic challenge.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence System for Predicting Prostate Cancer Lesions from Shear Wave Elastography Measurements.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Prostate cancer follow-up costs in Germany from 2000 to 2015.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Why Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Miss Clinically Significant Cancer?The Journal of urology · 2022Article
- Article
- Power Doppler Sonography (PDS) and Modified TRUS Systematic Biopsies - Can this Combination Adequately Replace Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) in Candidates for Re Biopsies Who cannot Undergo mp-MRI.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Active surveillance eligibility of MRI-positive patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer: a pathological study.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Performance of systematic, MRI-targeted biopsies alone or in combination for the prediction of unfavourable disease in MRI-positive low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Assessment of the Minimal Targeted Biopsy Core Number per MRI Lesion for Improving Prostate Cancer Grading Prediction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- HyperpolarizedOncotarget · 2019Article
- A graphene gold nanocomposite-based 5-FU drug and the enhancement of the MCF-7 cell line treatment.RSC advances · 2019Article
- MRI-targeted biopsies: What's next?World journal of urology · 2019Article
- Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.The Journal of urology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved clinicians' ability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Combining or fusing these images with the real-time imaging of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) allows urologists to better sample lesions with a targeted biopsy (Tbx) leading to the detection of greater rates of csPCa and decreased rates of low-risk PCa. In this review, we evaluate the technical aspects of the mpMRI-guided Tbx procedure to identify possible sources of error and provide clinical context to a negative Tbx.
methodsA literature search was conducted of possible reasons for false-negative TBx. This includes discussion on false-positive mpMRI findings, termed "PCa mimics," that may incorrectly suggest high likelihood of csPCa as well as errors during Tbx resulting in inexact image fusion or biopsy needle placement.
resultsDespite the strong negative predictive value associated with Tbx, concerns of missed disease often remain, especially with MR-visible lesions. This raises questions about what to do next after a negative Tbx result. Potential sources of error can arise from each step in the targeted biopsy process ranging from "PCa mimics" or technical errors during mpMRI acquisition to failure to properly register MRI and TRUS images on a fusion biopsy platform to technical or anatomic limits on needle placement accuracy.
conclusionsA better understanding of these potential pitfalls in the mpMRI-guided Tbx procedure will aid interpretation of a negative Tbx, identify areas for improving technical proficiency, and improve both physician understanding of negative Tbx and patient-management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29785491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.